Net54baseball.com Forums
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Net54baseball.com Forums (http://www.net54baseball.com/index.php)
-   Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) (http://www.net54baseball.com/forumdisplay.php?f=7)
-   -   PSA and off center cards (http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=230352)

KingFisk 03-27-2019 12:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jchcollins (Post 1865587)
Don't say this forum doesn't have influence...for some reason ever since I first saw this thread some time back, I couldn't stop thinking about this comment. Back some years ago (I wasn't a kid, but felt the same way) I had the Carlton rookie, but got rid of it at some point. So, this came in the mail today. Wow, a Steve Carlton rookie!!" Not o/c, but lower grade and cool nonetheless!

https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201...17a897b17e.jpg
Of course, I love this post.

Sent from my SM-G960U1 using Tapatalk

jason.1969 04-08-2019 03:32 PM
1 Attachment(s)
Am curious what you guys think is better if you're trying to sell a card. I requested no qualifiers when I submitted this to PSA and ended up with a 2.5. I've definitely seen uglier specimens than this get 4s, so I'm wondering if I would have been better off with something like a 4 (O/C).

Attachment 349686

swarmee 04-08-2019 03:57 PM
Well, they gave it a 2.5 due to the wear, not the centering. So there must be some creasing that's not visible or back damage. Presents really well, and it's better for the registry and for resale value (IMO) to be in the 2.5 slab.

jason.1969 04-08-2019 04:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by swarmee (Post 1868579)
Well, they gave it a 2.5 due to the wear, not the centering. So there must be some creasing that's not visible or back damage. Presents really well, and it's better for the registry and for resale value (IMO) to be in the 2.5 slab.
Thanks. Back is clean. No creases, but there is one very small area along right border that has slight indentation.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

swarmee 04-08-2019 04:41 PM
If that's the case, I'd probably send it in for review. Could easily be a 3.5-4 IMO. At least with a review, if it didn't bump, they'd give you the reason it only got a 2.5.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:33 AM.
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page