Net54baseball.com Forums

Net54baseball.com Forums (http://www.net54baseball.com/index.php)
-   Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions (http://www.net54baseball.com/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   1956 Mantle PSA 5....What is this sticker?? (Purple Label Company) (http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=254339)

2dueces 05-07-2018 08:55 AM

IIRC Jim Crandell was going to send all his PSA cards to Kevin to have them inspected for a fee. I also remember Jim was debating crossing all his cards to
Global. I think this purple sticker will go the way of 4th party grading.

Rich Klein 05-07-2018 09:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 1774021)
That's the whole point Rich. We can judge these things for ourselves, we don't need a sticker.

WE Can tell; not everyone who buys cards is as well-educated as we are. I will repeat what I said, and this is not whether I believe he is doing good work or not. For some people; having that sticker makes sense and the market is not being serviced for this type of situation.

If he does a good job, people will use the service. If not, the service will go away. But it is something not currently done in the marketplace and as such does make sense as a new opportunity for a business.

I remember having breakfast with Roger Neufelt before a Philly show maybe 12-15 years ago and this is when PSA had not yet created the .5. His point at the time was a PSA 8 could be a 7.51 to an 8.50. Using that logic, an card which we would now grade 8.5 was graded an 8 and thus qualifies for that purple sticker.

Peter_Spaeth 05-07-2018 10:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 2dueces (Post 1774100)
IIRC Jim Crandell was going to send all his PSA cards to Kevin to have them inspected for a fee. I also remember Jim was debating crossing all his cards to
Global. I think this purple sticker will go the way of 4th party grading.

I don't think Jim was serious about sending his cards to Kevin.

btcarfagno 05-07-2018 11:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by t206fix (Post 1773161)
I'll put a gold sticker on any card you send to me at only $4 per review. I've got a pretty good eye (the right one, left one is a little wonky). Every card will get the gold star, I don't discriminate. For $6, I'll put on two. Here's an example

http://i792.photobucket.com/albums/y...psfnkcmzj1.jpg

Why is Larry Doyle wearing nipple pasties? I'm confused. And a bit worried.

JollyElm 05-07-2018 03:52 PM

1 Attachment(s)
This is Miss Mukherjee. If you show her your cards and she feels they're undergraded, she will happily place a purple star sticker on them for you...and if you're polite, she'll also give you a lollipop.

Attachment 315083

Aquarian Sports Cards 05-07-2018 03:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by btcarfagno (Post 1774157)
http://i792.photobucket.com/albums/y...psfnkcmzj1.jpg

Why is Larry Doyle wearing nipple pasties? I'm confused. And a bit worried.

Maybe he was strangely excited by Merkle's Boner...

brianp-beme 05-07-2018 07:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bobbyw8469 (Post 1773960)
I see your point....but what if we get graders grading the graders who are grading the graders (see what I did there)? At what point do you draw the line?

I like listening to Elvis Costello singing about a woman who is watching the detectives.

I also like this line from a more recent song from another group: "He took the mirrors off his Cadillac...because he don't like looking like he looks back."

Brian (this Poor/Fair post deserves a purple star!)

bbcemporium 05-07-2018 07:40 PM

A good reminder
 
This thread is a good reminder why I rarely participate on Net54

bobbyw8469 05-07-2018 07:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bbcemporium (Post 1774371)
This thread is a good reminder why I rarely participate on Net54

LMFAO....Don't do foolish things and don't get called out....how about that?? There's a novel idea.

bobbyw8469 05-07-2018 07:49 PM

If you can't see the point of anything anyone is saying, then I can't help you.

bbcemporium 05-07-2018 07:51 PM

foolish?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by bobbyw8469 (Post 1774374)
LMFAO....Don't do foolish things and don't get called out....how about that?? There's a novel idea.

Foolish? The irony....

bbcemporium 05-07-2018 08:16 PM

-
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by bobbyw8469 (Post 1774375)
If you can't see the point of anything anyone is saying, then I can't help you.

How about I just focus on your contributions in this thread:

1. You attack the credibility of Greg (whom I have never met or communicated with) in post #20 over a screw-down holder. I can tell you that I have personally taken thousands of vintage cards out of screw-down holders and never had a card get damaged or rejected by a TPG. Is it possible? I'm sure it is, but you're really going to attack the credibility of someone for estimating the grade of a card in a screw-down holder?

2. You attack Greg for labeling his own product. Concerning? yes, but where is your outrage over Baseball Card Exchange for authenticating their own product? They are the largest dealer of unopened material in our hobby and doing the exact same thing.

3. You really seem unable to differentiate the concept of technical grade and eye appeal. Nobody is claiming that this company is stickering cards that a TPG undergraded. The TPG got it right with the technical grade. However, there are a lot of cards that have an eye appeal that is superior to the assigned technical grade. This is the service that Greg is trying to provide.

Will I ever use this service? Absolutely not, as I have sufficient experience to detect these cards on my own. But I've dealt with a lot of people in this hobby, and I can tell you that a good percentage of this hobby does not have this skill set.

Let this guy Greg pursue his idea - if it is a needed service in our hobby, it will do okay, if not, it will fail. I just don't get why people feel the need to attack him and humiliate him.

This is why this thread has served as a good reminder why I rarely participate on Net54.

bnorth 05-07-2018 08:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bbcemporium (Post 1774382)
How about I just focus on your contributions in this thread:

1. You attack the credibility of Greg (whom I have never met or communicated with) in post #20 over a screw-down holder. I can tell you that I have personally taken thousands of vintage cards out of screw-down holders and never had a card get damaged or rejected by a TPG. Is it possible? I'm sure it is, but you're really going to attack the credibility of someone for estimating the grade of a card in a screw-down holder?

2. You attack Greg for labeling his own product. Concerning? yes, but where is your outrage over Baseball Card Exchange for authenticating their own product? They are the largest dealer of unopened material in our hobby and doing the exact same thing.

3. You really seem unable to differentiate the concept of technical grade and eye appeal. Nobody is claiming that this company is stickering cards that a TPG undergraded. The TPG got it right with the technical grade. However, there are a lot of cards that have an eye appeal that is superior to the assigned technical grade. This is the service that Greg is trying to provide.

Will I ever use this service? Absolutely not, as I have sufficient experience to detect these cards on my own. But I've dealt with a lot of people in this hobby, and I can tell you that a good percentage of this hobby does not have this skill set.

Let this guy Greg pursue his idea - if it is a needed service in our hobby, it will do okay, if not, it will fail. I just don't get why people feel the need to attack him and humiliate him.

This is why this thread has served as a good reminder why I rarely participate on Net54.

But awesome threads like this one keep some of us on here. Happy collecting and please make more great posts like this one.:)

bobbyw8469 05-07-2018 09:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bbcemporium (Post 1774382)
How about I just focus on your contributions in this thread:

1. You attack the credibility of Greg (whom I have never met or communicated with) in post #20 over a screw-down holder. I can tell you that I have personally taken thousands of vintage cards out of screw-down holders and never had a card get damaged or rejected by a TPG. Is it possible? I'm sure it is, but you're really going to attack the credibility of someone for estimating the grade of a card in a screw-down holder?

2. You attack Greg for labeling his own product. Concerning? yes, but where is your outrage over Baseball Card Exchange for authenticating their own product? They are the largest dealer of unopened material in our hobby and doing the exact same thing.

3. You really seem unable to differentiate the concept of technical grade and eye appeal. Nobody is claiming that this company is stickering cards that a TPG undergraded. The TPG got it right with the technical grade. However, there are a lot of cards that have an eye appeal that is superior to the assigned technical grade. This is the service that Greg is trying to provide.



PS - For #1, I call BS - A card in a screwdown holder will get "ALTERED STOCK" 9 times out of 10. So don't come on here with false claims.

Even Steve Borack had to sell his personal comic book collection before he joined CGC. I repeat, if you can't see the obvious conflict of interest, then I am sorry....I can't help you.....so sorry you have nothing to add to the board and that myself and others have let you down.

Will I ever use this service? Absolutely not, as I have sufficient experience to detect these cards on my own. But I've dealt with a lot of people in this hobby, and I can tell you that a good percentage of this hobby does not have this skill set.

Let this guy Greg pursue his idea - if it is a needed service in our hobby, it will do okay, if not, it will fail. I just don't get why people feel the need to attack him and humiliate him.

This is why this thread has served as a good reminder why I rarely participate on Net54.


How about this good buddy! I would take this venture (which is an obvious ripoff of the PWCC High End Designation - but that is another debate) seriously, if #1) he was an IMPARTIAL 3rd party....IE - DO NOT APPLY THE STICKER TO YOUR OWN INVENTORY, and #2) If you are going to apply it to your own inventory (conflict of interest nonwithstanding) be damned sure that the cards you are applying it to, are indeed WORTHY of being HIGH END for the grade. I have yet to see ONE sticker applied correctly.

Even Steve Borock had to sell his personal comic book collection before he joined CGC. Do you understand why he did that??? CONFLICT OF INTEREST. I am sorry that you have nothing to add to the board. I am sorry that myself and other like minded individuals on here have let you down.

PS - For #1 I call BS......A card in a screw down holder will 9 times out of 10 get "altered stock". Facts. Not fiction. You have lost credibility with me with your false statement. If you took the time to read what I wrote, I said, be TRUTHFUL with the guy. A Mantle that has been in a screwdown holder for over three decades WILL PROBABLY GET ALTERED STOCK. IT DAMAGES THE CARD!!!!! You can say that is doesn't and you have sneaked 1,000 out of 1,000 by PSA. I know better. To tell the guy otherwise helps the "feel good" story, but doesn't present him with the truth.

larrydavidfan33 05-08-2018 09:47 AM

Geez didn't realize I would start such a discussion.... being very new to the card thing I'd say this sticker thing now that I understand is a decent idea; the coin industry uses it and it seems to matter from what I researched this past week. I also found a company called PWCC who has a HIGH END sticker called pwcc-he ! Not sure if u buy it for auction? Or if u ask them to adhere it ? As a newb I can't help but ask WHY DO I NEED TO AUCTION MY CARD to get a 'he' sticker?
I don't really buy expensive cards could never afford to add $5 to cost lol ... is there a $1 sticker

Exhibitman 05-08-2018 09:53 AM

https://photos.imageevent.com/exhibi...ter%20fire.jpg

npa589 05-08-2018 10:02 AM

This is very stupid. *End rant*

bbcemporium 05-08-2018 10:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bobbyw8469 (Post 1774411)
PS - For #1 I call BS......A card in a screw down holder will 9 times out of 10 get "altered stock". Facts. Not fiction. You have lost credibility with me with your false statement. If you took the time to read what I wrote, I said, be TRUTHFUL with the guy. A Mantle that has been in a screwdown holder for over three decades WILL PROBABLY GET ALTERED STOCK. IT DAMAGES THE CARD!!!!! You can say that is doesn't and you have sneaked 1,000 out of 1,000 by PSA. I know better. To tell the guy otherwise helps the "feel good" story, but doesn't present him with the truth.

Bobby, out of curiosity, how many cards have you removed from a screw-down holders and submitted to PSA? Are you seriously claiming 90% will get rejected by PSA?

Peter_Spaeth 05-08-2018 11:35 AM

I thought Bob was only talking about cards that had been in screwdowns for "several decades." Back in the 80s not sure if people were protecting cards with a sleeve, or taking care not to overtighten the screws, so it wouldn't surprise me if some of those will be worse for wear when removed.

bbcemporium 05-08-2018 11:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 1774573)
I thought Bob was only talking about cards that had been in screwdowns for "several decades." Back in the 80s not sure if people were protecting cards with a sleeve, or taking care not to overtighten the screws, so it wouldn't surprise me if some of those will be worse for wear when removed.

Peter, I am also referring to cards in screwdowns for "several decades". I frequently buy private collections and come across cards that have been in screwdowns since the 80s on a regular basis and am yet to have one rejected by PSA. Is it possible to overtighten it and "flatten" the card? I'm sure it is possible, but to question the credibility of Greg or claim 90% will get rejected is ludicrous.

Peter_Spaeth 05-08-2018 12:10 PM

I would think the worst case scenario is probably some corner damage which might affect the grade but would not affect whether they grade.

Eric72 05-08-2018 12:18 PM

Sorry if this has already been brought up...

It seems to me that this new company/product will become a likely target for scammers. If someone can sneak a few fake/altered/compromised slabs through the system, they would be able to (fraudulently) profit from doing so.

Please note, I am NOT saying the person running the business would be doing this. I am merely stating that there will almost certainly be a non-zero amount of crooks looking to exploit this somehow.

bbcemporium 05-08-2018 12:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 1774589)
I would think the worst case scenario is probably some corner damage which might affect the grade but would not affect whether they grade.

I agree

Lothar52 05-13-2018 06:32 AM

If I want to start a company that graded a persons natural toenail “quality” and place a sticker on them such that they get a hotter date..... none of you SOB’s are stopping me!!!!

Let the man do his thing... it’s called Capitalism

Leon 05-13-2018 06:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lothar52 (Post 1776216)
If I want to start a company that graded a persons natural toenail “quality” and place a sticker on them such that they get a hotter date..... none of you SOB’s are stopping me!!!!

Let the man do his thing... it’s called Capitalism

We'll let him do his thing and you can put your full name out here. thanks

Steve D 05-13-2018 02:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by steve B (Post 1772406)
I haven't really decided on what I think about this.

With Coins, the Company is CAC, and they do provide a decent service. Coins have been graded for longer than cards, with all the same issues (shouldn't be a surprise right)
They've been graded for so long, that the "standards" have slipped for several years now, some of it is a need for "new" coins in an acceptable grade, some of it is a lack of coins that are all that great in middle grades. So a VG say 20 years ago would get a better grade today. (Not my opinion, I got that from an article by a very long time dealer. ) So a sticker from CAC actually in most cases does mean "if graded today it will probably grade higher"

I don't see quite the same dynamic in cards. Overall, cards are probably at a point where the standards have tightened up a bit. So I'm thinking that right now it isn't really necessary.
But.........someday it will be. Maybe sooner than later, there's close to 30 years of grading, and the standards have evolved as well as the way they're applied.
PSA got where they are by being "first" (Not actually, but first with some features and certainly first with good marketing)
So if a similar service to CAC is going to happen, and it will (Just did!) It's probably a good business move to start it now.


The big thing in CAC's favor is that it was started by John Albanese, who is a long-time and well respected member of the numismatic community. He has the "credentials"; coin collectors know who he is, and they respect his opinion.

In the case of "Purple Label LLC", who is Greg Campbell? I've been a member of the baseball card community since the 1970s, going to shows, subscribed to Sports Collectors' Digest, The Trader Speaks, Baseball Hobby News, Baseball Cards Magazine, Beckett....., I've been a member of both the CU and Network54 message boards for several years, have bought from/placed bids with most of the major auction houses/dealers, and I have never heard of Greg Campbell anywhere until this thread.

It seems to me, to start something like CAC in the sports card community, and be successful, you should have immediate name recognition; someone like Brent Huigens, Steve Hart, Kit Young, Levi Bleam, Bill Goodwin, Dave Kohler; i.e., someone who has been around for years/decades, and who is known and respected in the community. To me, this Greg Campbell doesn't fit the bill.

Steve

JollyElm 05-13-2018 03:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lothar52 (Post 1776216)
If I want to start a company that graded a persons natural toenail “quality” and place a sticker on them such that they get a hotter date..... none of you SOB’s are stopping me!!!!

Let the man do his thing... it’s called Capitalism

I've always been under the impression that within a capitalist system, the principle of free speech was very, very important. I guess you disagree with that. Interesting.

bensie 05-14-2018 12:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ruth_rookie (Post 1773295)
I was his first customer and got 2 for 2...

all kidding aside, there's no doubt that all 5's are not equal. Nor 6's. Nor 7's, etc. The question is "are people willing to pay for a third party to make that assessment?" we've already paid good money to have it graded, and now we pay again. not sure what the answer is. only time and the market will tell. can't blame someone for giving it a go, however. I wish you luck in your new endeavor. who knows, maybe it will pan out.

Well, the thing that really confuses me is if you have a '6' with a purple sticker, that implies that it's possibly undergraded, right? So maybe a '7', but not quite. Well, isn't that what the PSA half grades are for? So a '6' with a sticker means that the card is actually a '6.25'? Seems like a stupid idea, and I'd actually pay less for a purple sticker card since I'd have to spend effort removing that ugly purple piece of crap.

Marchillo 05-14-2018 04:49 AM

In theory I don’t think it’s a bad concept. Not every 5 is the same not every 6 is the same etc. I see people on eBay and on BST say their cards are undergraded. So if you don’t want to regrade here is the alternative. My question is how is the sticker determined. Does the company have flaw preferences? Does a card that is centered get a sticker despite having dinged corners and a small wrinkle versus an oc card that has nicer corners and no wrinkles?

The other thing I’ll say is I don’t think this works as a mail in service. I mail in 10 cards I feel are undergraded and get 3 stickers. So I pay $50 for these 3 stickers. Plus shipping etc. seems to me this would work better as an in person service. Charge $1 or $2 for rejects and $5 for the sticker. Not sure if that is profitable enough. Plus you might get a lot of pissed off people who disagree with the rejection of their undergraded cards.

I don’t think I’d personally use the service but based on some of the complaints I see for TPGs I understand the concept.

iwantitiwinit 05-14-2018 05:14 AM

Two questions:

1) How can you ensure you will only sticker say 1% or 5% or any % of the cards submitted. For instance, I submit a card to you on day 1 that you deem to be of high grade and sticker it, day 247 someone else submits another card you also deem is high for the grade and sticker that, etc, etc, etc. To ensure you properly sticker only say 1% you would need to know beforehand how many cards truly exist at the top end of the range for that particular grade. I don't see how thats possible beforehand especially since existing cards are being graded every day thereby increasing the total graded population at any grade. It could end up that a high % of the cards in a particular grade for that player in that issue receive a sticker which ends up causing this selectivity service being self defeating.

2) Assuming you are reviewing the card thru the slab (i'm too lazy to go and see if thats how you review the card) and don't have the raw card in hand so you can't see all the flaws, ie, wavy edges, discolorations, types of stains, etc. As a result I might buy a card that has been stickered but if I submitted it for review to say PSA it might not truly be high end for the grade.

I would think this process could actually de-value a card.


Seems gimicky I will pass.

robkas68 05-14-2018 05:20 AM

purple sticker
 
Could we have a yellow sticker for every overgraded card. Or perhaps multiple colors. If the card got a 7 but deserves a 6 it could be yellow. If it deserved a 5 it could be orange. If it should have been graded authentic altered it could be red with the letters WTF printed on the sticker. Now that would be a valuable service.

iwantitiwinit 05-14-2018 05:55 AM

Here's an idea lets slab the slab with a purple label rather than purple sticker so it can't be removed. Then in a few years we can make it a black label rather than purple to require resubmission of the slab-slab. Then make a different slab size to require another re-submission for slab-slab, etc. Oh the HUMANITY. This is ridiculous.

bobbyw8469 05-14-2018 06:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by iwantitiwinit (Post 1776578)
Here's an idea lets slab the slab with a purple label rather than purple sticker so it can't be removed. Then in a few years we can make it a black label rather than purple to require resubmission of the slab-slab. Then make a different slab size to require another re-submission for slab-slab, etc. Oh the HUMANITY. This is ridiculous.

You forgot.....then introduce QUARTER grades.....and then the ever elusive 9.5!!!

barrysloate 05-14-2018 07:03 AM

CAC stickers are certainly popular in the coin hobby and typically garner a premium. I look at a lot of coins and those that are stickered always have nice surfaces and very good eye appeal. So it does have some credibility.

In the baseball card hobby, cards with perfect or near perfect centering could easily be stickered, as well as those with exceptional eye appeal.

That said, IMO less is more, and we as collectors are relying too much on the opinions of third party graders. In a perfect world we would learn to grade our own cards, and do it accurately so that others would accept our opinions. But slabs have taken over many hobbies, and they have become among the most incredible marketing tools ever.

Peter_Spaeth 05-14-2018 11:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by iwantitiwinit (Post 1776570)
Two questions:

1) How can you ensure you will only sticker say 1% or 5% or any % of the cards submitted. For instance, I submit a card to you on day 1 that you deem to be of high grade and sticker it, day 247 someone else submits another card you also deem is high for the grade and sticker that, etc, etc, etc. To ensure you properly sticker only say 1% you would need to know beforehand how many cards truly exist at the top end of the range for that particular grade. I don't see how thats possible beforehand especially since existing cards are being graded every day thereby increasing the total graded population at any grade. It could end up that a high % of the cards in a particular grade for that player in that issue receive a sticker which ends up causing this selectivity service being self defeating.

2) Assuming you are reviewing the card thru the slab (i'm too lazy to go and see if thats how you review the card) and don't have the raw card in hand so you can't see all the flaws, ie, wavy edges, discolorations, types of stains, etc. As a result I might buy a card that has been stickered but if I submitted it for review to say PSA it might not truly be high end for the grade.

I would think this process could actually de-value a card.


Seems gimicky I will pass.

Nobody is going to submit if there is only a 1 in 20 or worse chance of getting the sticker, IMO. And in any event this seems doomed to end up being arbitrary, or political, or both.

steve B 05-14-2018 12:43 PM

That's a really interesting point Steve.

I've collected coins longer than I've collected cards, but with a lot more and longer "vacations" from the hobby. Started coins as a kid, figure around 1970, maybe/probably a bit earlier. Didn't start cards until 73-4 and got more into it in 77. Actually did both plus stamps plus other stuff off and on for a while. Without much budget of course.

With all the time I've taken off from coins, I don't really know who anyone is aside from maybe a few of the really long term people that write for the magazines.

That instant credibility vs relative obscurity is probably going to be a key thing going forward. And it may end up being regional, someone well known in Mass might not be well known in Cal.


Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve D (Post 1776358)
The big thing in CAC's favor is that it was started by John Albanese, who is a long-time and well respected member of the numismatic community. He has the "credentials"; coin collectors know who he is, and they respect his opinion.

In the case of "Purple Label LLC", who is Greg Campbell? I've been a member of the baseball card community since the 1970s, going to shows, subscribed to Sports Collectors' Digest, The Trader Speaks, Baseball Hobby News, Baseball Cards Magazine, Beckett....., I've been a member of both the CU and Network54 message boards for several years, have bought from/placed bids with most of the major auction houses/dealers, and I have never heard of Greg Campbell anywhere until this thread.

It seems to me, to start something like CAC in the sports card community, and be successful, you should have immediate name recognition; someone like Brent Huigens, Steve Hart, Kit Young, Levi Bleam, Bill Goodwin, Dave Kohler; i.e., someone who has been around for years/decades, and who is known and respected in the community. To me, this Greg Campbell doesn't fit the bill.

Steve


steve B 05-14-2018 12:47 PM

We need a facebookesque "like" button.

How do you do it? I could never be that concise and on point.

Steve B

Quote:

Originally Posted by barrysloate (Post 1776588)
CAC stickers are certainly popular in the coin hobby and typically garner a premium. I look at a lot of coins and those that are stickered always have nice surfaces and very good eye appeal. So it does have some credibility.

In the baseball card hobby, cards with perfect or near perfect centering could easily be stickered, as well as those with exceptional eye appeal.

That said, IMO less is more, and we as collectors are relying too much on the opinions of third party graders. In a perfect world we would learn to grade our own cards, and do it accurately so that others would accept our opinions. But slabs have taken over many hobbies, and they have become among the most incredible marketing tools ever.


barrysloate 05-14-2018 12:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by steve B (Post 1776697)
We need a facebookesque "like" button.

How do you do it? I could never be that concise and on point.

Steve B

I'm a man of few words.:)

Peter_Spaeth 05-14-2018 01:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by steve B (Post 1776695)
That's a really interesting point Steve.

I've collected coins longer than I've collected cards, but with a lot more and longer "vacations" from the hobby. Started coins as a kid, figure around 1970, maybe/probably a bit earlier. Didn't start cards until 73-4 and got more into it in 77. Actually did both plus stamps plus other stuff off and on for a while. Without much budget of course.

With all the time I've taken off from coins, I don't really know who anyone is aside from maybe a few of the really long term people that write for the magazines.

That instant credibility vs relative obscurity is probably going to be a key thing going forward. And it may end up being regional, someone well known in Mass might not be well known in Cal.

I can just see Levi adding 707-HE stickers. :eek:

But to me the issue isn't whether Greg is known, I believe from what has been said that he has the credentials, there are many experts who have flown under the radar. For me, the question is whether this service really adds value and I'm just not in favor of 4th party grading whether it's done by Brent, Greg, or anyone else.

Stampsfan 05-14-2018 01:42 PM

This sounds similar to an audit. That can be somewhat painful.

Leon, can we add a purple sticker to threads? Then we would all know which ones are worth reading and which ones are not.

:D

the 'stache 05-16-2018 05:30 PM

/head explodes

MULLINS5 05-21-2018 07:17 PM

This guy clearly has no idea what he is doing and has already failed.

bobbyw8469 05-22-2018 06:16 AM

Seeing as how he is labeling his own product with wild abandon (whether it truly deserves it or not) while you got a 1 out of 20 shot of getting one yourself tells me all I need to know about this venture.

Leon 05-22-2018 06:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bobbyw8469 (Post 1779202)
Seeing as how he is labeling his own product with wild abandon (whether it truly deserves it or not) while you got a 1 out of 20 shot of getting one yourself tells me all I need to know about this venture.

I predict we will see more from them soon. And I think they will make a good run at it. A lot of people use CAC for coins? We shall see.....

Peter_Spaeth 05-22-2018 06:24 AM

What is the point of applying a purple label to a card Beckett already has graded Gem Mint?

https://www.ebay.com/itm/1992-Bowman...4AAOSwFUxa7lS9

Leon 05-22-2018 06:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 1779205)
What is the point of applying a purple label to a card Beckett already has graded Gem Mint?

https://www.ebay.com/itm/1992-Bowman...4AAOSwFUxa7lS9

I will let them answer questions for themselves. I spoke with the owner very recently. He understands the uphill battle. I told him I don't need his services and a lot of board members don't either. That said, there are more coin collectors than card collectors and CAC seems to be doing fine. Maybe the 9.5 is a high end 9.5?

Peter_Spaeth 05-22-2018 06:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Leon (Post 1779207)
I will let them answer questions for themselves. I spoke with the owner very recently. He understands the uphill battle. I told him I don't need his services and a lot of board members don't either. That said, there are more coin collectors than card collectors and CAC seems to be doing fine. Maybe the 9.5 is a high end 9.5?

A high end Gem Mint? Head explodes, as Bill G. said.

bobbyw8469 05-22-2018 06:38 AM

If this business wants to succeed, IF it starts getting popular, the #1 thing he should do is hire an impartial grader. After seeing this sticker on the Johnny Bench PSA 1 with all the numerous flaws it had leads me to believe he IS NOT impartial. Like Leon, there might be a need for this in the future. PWCC already got the ball rolling with their HE stickers. When you are trying to get yourself established NOW is not the time for half measures.

pokerplyr80 05-22-2018 12:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 1779205)
What is the point of applying a purple label to a card Beckett already has graded Gem Mint?

https://www.ebay.com/itm/1992-Bowman...4AAOSwFUxa7lS9

Possible bump to a psa 10?

clydepepper 05-22-2018 12:29 PM

Hey, I used to do the same thing with my girlfriends...used to....


:mad::cool:


.

calvindog 05-22-2018 12:37 PM

I hope these guys don't quit their day jobs.

Aquarian Sports Cards 05-22-2018 01:36 PM

who, the comedians or the sticker guys? :D

supermint1975 05-22-2018 02:05 PM

Purple Stickers
 
They posted a bunch of cards with stickers on their facebook page. They actually look pretty nice.


https://www.facebook.com/purplelabelcard/

Bliggity 05-22-2018 02:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by supermint1975 (Post 1779392)
They posted a bunch of cards with stickers on their facebook page. They actually look pretty nice.


https://www.facebook.com/purplelabelcard/

I see a 1960 Fleer Jack Kemp PSA 8 that's off-center with bad registration.
A 1966 Topps Mantle PSA 4 with a diamond cut and moderate corner wear.
A 1978 OPC Murray PSA 8 that's off-center.
A 1960 Topps Yaz RC PSA 5 with significant PD.

All cards that I would consider average for the grade.

Does not inspire confidence.

bobbyw8469 05-22-2018 02:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bliggity (Post 1779397)
I see a 1960 Fleer Jack Kemp PSA 8 that's off-center with bad registration.
A 1966 Topps Mantle PSA 4 with a diamond cut and moderate corner wear.
A 1978 OBC Murray PSA 8 that's off-center.
A 1960 Topps Yaz RC PSA 5 with significant PD.

All cards that I would consider average for the grade.

Does not inspire confidence.

That's what I am saying. It cheapens the brand when these stickers are handed out willy-nilly. They should ONLY be reserved for top tier items. I do want to see this person succeed. He needs to take the advice he has been given here to heart though.

Rookiemonster 05-22-2018 02:40 PM

I still would like a answer to my questions.


I’ll ask one of them again . How can a 10 or for a better example a BGS 9.5 get a purple sticker ? Is it better then most 9.5s? How ?

pokerplyr80 05-22-2018 06:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rookiemonster (Post 1779402)
I still would like a answer to my questions.


I’ll ask one of them again . How can a 10 or for a better example a BGS 9.5 get a purple sticker ? Is it better then most 9.5s? How ?

Better centering, free of minor print defects or other small flaws that are still permitted on a 9.5 or 10.

Peter_Spaeth 05-22-2018 06:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pokerplyr80 (Post 1779472)
Better centering, free of minor print defects or other small flaws that are still permitted on a 9.5 or 10.

And how many BGS 9.5 Mariano Riveras do you think you would have to examine before you could say with confidence that a particular one was the 1 in 20 that merited the purple sticker?

Orioles1954 05-22-2018 07:37 PM

Not sure if this question has been asked or answered yet. However, what provisions are made if a "purple label" holder does not crossover or get a better grade through re-submission? Are only PSA, SGC and BGS holders evaluated? What about GAI?

pokerplyr80 05-22-2018 08:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 1779475)
And how many BGS 9.5 Mariano Riveras do you think you would have to examine before you could say with confidence that a particular one was the 1 in 20 that merited the purple sticker?

Yea I'm not saying I felt that Rivera deserved a purple sticker. And I already stated I think this idea is pretty ridiculous and unnecessary. But there are cards I've seen that have had noticable difference between one 9.5 or 10 and another. I have seen off center psa 10s, and others with focus issues or print defects. Look at a few 86 Jordans for example.

Peter_Spaeth 05-22-2018 08:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pokerplyr80 (Post 1779574)
Yea I'm not saying I felt that Rivera deserved a purple sticker. And I already stated I think this idea is pretty ridiculous and unnecessary. But there are cards I've seen that have had noticable difference between one 9.5 or 10 and another. I have seen off center psa 10s, and others with focus issues or print defects. Look at a few 86 Jordans for example.

Well sure Beckett 9.5s explicitly have different subgrades so sure you can get ones with better surface, centering, corners, etc. PSA 10s should have less variance but yes I have seen that as well. But as you know we don't need a purple sticker to tell us a card is centered.

bnorth 05-22-2018 08:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Orioles1954 (Post 1779525)
Not sure if this question has been asked or answered yet. However, what provisions are made if a "purple label" holder does not crossover or get a better grade through re-submission? Are only PSA, SGC and BGS holders evaluated? What about GAI?

Why would a purple sticker guarantee a better grade? I never seen this anyplace, did you?

If you go to the website it will answer your questions on what companies they work with.

Rookiemonster 05-22-2018 09:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 1779576)
Well sure Beckett 9.5s explicitly have different subgrades so sure you can get ones with better surface, centering, corners, etc. PSA 10s should have less variance but yes I have seen that as well. But as you know we don't need a purple sticker to tell us a card is centered.

Right , I don’t think a 10 can get a purple sticker. If it does then I would also question the grading company. Your telling me this card that is graded ABOVE MINT condition can be better then other 10s? I feel like I’m studying string theory. I get it but is it really possible?

pokerplyr80 05-22-2018 09:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rookiemonster (Post 1779588)
Right , I don’t think a 10 can get a purple sticker. If it does then I would also question the grading company. Your telling me this card that is graded ABOVE MINT condition can be better then other 10s? I feel like I’m studying string theory. I get it but is it really possible?

Yes.

pokerplyr80 05-22-2018 09:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 1779576)
Well sure Beckett 9.5s explicitly have different subgrades so sure you can get ones with better surface, centering, corners, etc. PSA 10s should have less variance but yes I have seen that as well. But as you know we don't need a purple sticker to tell us a card is centered.

I think we're in agreement Peter. I dont need a purple sticker to tell me a card looks better than its grade either. But to discount this company simply because they put a sticker on a bgs 9.5 or psa 10 card would be a mistake in my opinion. There are plenty of other reasons to do so.

vintagetoppsguy 05-26-2018 08:26 AM

I see these guys are advertisers here now. Good luck to them...they're going to need it.

Leon 05-26-2018 08:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vintagetoppsguy (Post 1780658)
I see these guys are advertisers here now. Good luck to them...they're going to need it.

+1 Believe me, I told them they would need more than a lot of luck, maybe a miracle? LOL Stranger things have happened and my guess is CAC got the same treatment when they started. I am with the rest of the board on this one though and only playing some devil's advocate for conversation.

ps...they will need to tighten up their standards at the very least, from some things I (and others) have seen.

lowpopper 05-27-2018 06:32 PM

Purple Label
 
Thank you Leon for the advertising opportunity. Also, thank you to
everyone who had comments or suggestions. Everybody has been
heard loud and clear. Your critique [good or bad] is actually vital to
the growth of our service. I say that with absolute sincerity.

Thanks to everyone again,

Greg

Kmad515 06-08-2018 08:19 PM

Can't wait to start my new business. Just need to get my website up...www.gradinggradingcards.com. Also, working on my new "blue labels" and my advertising campaign. "Not happy with your Purple Label review? Send your purple label cards to us for a truly independent review and we will tell you which purple labels really are the best in their purple label grading class by issuing our Blue Label stamp of approval! Just call us the guys who grade the guys who grade the guys who grade your cards!" 😂

mechanicalman 06-08-2018 08:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kmad515 (Post 1784970)
Can't wait to start my new business. Just need to get my website up...www.gradinggradingcards.com. Also, working on my new "blue labels" and my advertising campaign. "Not happy with your Purple Label review? Send your purple label cards to us for a truly independent review and we will tell you which purple labels really are the best in their purple label grading class by issuing our Blue Label stamp of approval! Just call us the guys who grade the guys who grade the guys who grade your cards!" 😂

New guy coming in hot! But seriously, welcome.

lowpopper 06-15-2018 11:20 PM

Probstein is running a bunch of Purple Label cards

Here is one of the listings

https://www.ebay.com/itm/Lot-10-1968...edirect=mobile

Aquarian Sports Cards 06-16-2018 12:15 AM

LOL at a card with a qualifier and a purple sticker. It's a high-end 6(ST) I guess.

Stampsfan 06-16-2018 01:30 AM

But it's a high end stain... nicer than most stains you'd normally see on a '68 Topps.

drcy 06-16-2018 01:42 AM

I'm sorry, but this sticker stuff is retarded.

bobbyw8469 06-16-2018 04:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by drcy (Post 1787093)
I'm sorry, but this sticker stuff is retarded.


LOL....agreed.....especially when it appears to be applied haphazardly.

barrysloate 06-16-2018 06:26 AM

The purple sticker will only work if it is applied carefully, and not too frequently. I look at a lot of coins (as I've mentioned) and I always try to study as many as I can that have the CAC sticker. I see so many coins that are overgraded (what else is new) but I have to say the CAC coins generally look properly graded, and usually have nice eye appeal. So it looks like they are doing something right. Are the stickers needed? That's debatable. Are they accomplishing what they set out to do? It appears they are.

So the purple sticker has to be put on cards that genuinely deserve it. If the service just becomes a favor for dealers who do a lot of business and are putting a lot of pressure on the company for more stickers, then it will fail. Someone just posted a group of 1968 Topps that are PSA 7's and are all stickered. Frankly, they look like most other PSA 7's I see every day. So I am already a bit skeptical. Time will tell whether the hobby will accept them.

bnorth 06-16-2018 06:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bobbyw8469 (Post 1787095)
LOL....agreed.....especially when it appears to be applied haphazardly.

Just like PSA grades and the reason a Purple sticker could be a great help to collectors.

supermint1975 06-16-2018 08:12 AM

Purple 1968s
 
You guys are funny. This one looks pretty sweet though.

https://c2.staticflickr.com/2/1754/2...eff12329_z.jpg

calvindog 06-16-2018 08:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by drcy (Post 1787093)
I'm sorry, but this sticker stuff is retarded.

That's an insult to the retarded.

Peter_Spaeth 06-16-2018 08:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lowpopper (Post 1787085)
Probstein is running a bunch of Purple Label cards

Here is one of the listings

https://www.ebay.com/itm/Lot-10-1968...edirect=mobile

When one sees a group of 10 cards all the same year with this supposedly very selective sticker, it undermines the credibility, IMO anyhow.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:34 PM.