CJ Reprint?
I saw this one a few days ago - 1915 obviously (vs. 1914 claim) - thought it was a reprint given thicker looking paper stock and consistency which (to me) appears more in-line with other reprints. Hard to be sure off two scans ..
http://www.ebay.com/itm/1914-Cracker...gAAOSwPWRZOwte Thoughts? |
The boldness and clarity of the print, especially at the bottom, seems very inconsistent with the other wear on the card.
Fake. |
Agreed
99.9% chance it's fake.
|
Printing and lithography looks fake to me....
QUOTE=Edwolf1963;1673884]I saw this one a few days ago - 1915 obviously (vs. 1914 claim) - thought it was a reprint given thicker looking paper stock and consistency which (to me) appears more in-line with other reprints. Hard to be sure off two scans .. http://www.ebay.com/itm/1914-Cracker...gAAOSwPWRZOwte Thoughts?[/QUOTE] |
|
I would bet on a Dover reprint. Pretty easy to spot if you know what you doing. Card stock and overbold printing stand out.
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:42 PM. |