Quote:
There's a lot more to figure out past the sheet layout. The scratches can be more obvious or less even for the same card. So the plate -if it was a stone could have been resurfaced when it wore out and the scratches partly polished off. (I think it's possible, and some of the same scratches may have survived faintly into the 350 series. Combined with front differences that might eventually lead to understanding print runs within the currently accepted ones. While there's no real premium right now, I think eventually - like maybe 20 years from now. There will be an ability to sort of super specialize, and some fronts with the scratch may be much tougher than others. And if the scratch happened very late in production any scratch may prove to be fairly tough compared to a card without it. It's just way too early to tell. Steve B |
Quote:
It's just way too early to tell. |
Quote:
|
2 Attachment(s)
Schulte, not huge but it is there on the lower left
|
2 Attachment(s)
|
2 Attachment(s)
Another Three Finger, same pose, different scratch
|
Not sure if this counts but was looking thru my cards and saw a possible scratch. http://tapatalk.imageshack.com/v2/14...4696c689b5.jpghttp://tapatalk.imageshack.com/v2/14...89f65f4bdf.jpg
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
2 Attachment(s)
Just noticed my new Waddell Throwing has a scratch:
|
2 Attachment(s)
Found a nice card today with a big plate scratch, a P150 of "Turkey Mike" Donlin.
Hope this helps the cause in some way or another: |
Fred, nice Donlin, with or without the scratches. :)
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:15 AM. |