Net54baseball.com Forums

Net54baseball.com Forums (http://www.net54baseball.com/index.php)
-   Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used (http://www.net54baseball.com/forumdisplay.php?f=5)
-   -   500 HR Club (http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=219222)

Zach Wheat 03-06-2016 08:45 PM

500 HR Club
 
Apologies in advance if this has been discussed before but I did not see anything. I do not regularly post on this side.

I recently purchased a 500 HR Club baseball with autographs of 11 members......All of whom were from the pre-steroid era. Opinions requested on the desirability of adding autos of members in the steroid era?

Frankly, I like my ball as is and probably won't have others added....but just curious as to what others thought.

Z

ooo-ribay 03-06-2016 09:12 PM

I would say leave as is. Which 11 guys do you have?

packs 03-07-2016 11:26 AM

I'd add the clean guys like Frank Thomas, Albert Pujols, Jim Thome, and Ken Griffey Jr. But I' d leave off Manny Ramirez, McGwire, Sosa, Palmeiro, Sheffield, and Ortiz.

ooo-ribay 03-07-2016 01:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by packs (Post 1512682)
I'd add the clean guys like Frank Thomas, Albert Pujols, Jim Thome, and Ken Griffey Jr. But I' d leave off Manny Ramirez, McGwire, Sosa, Palmeiro, Sheffield, and Ortiz.


This is what drives me crazy.....the assumption that certain guys are clean. I would love to see Piazza start his HOF speech with, "Guess what?"

Scott Garner 03-07-2016 01:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by packs (Post 1512682)
I'd add the clean guys like Frank Thomas, Albert Pujols, Jim Thome, and Ken Griffey Jr. But I' d leave off Manny Ramirez, McGwire, Sosa, Palmeiro, Sheffield, and Ortiz.

Additionally, I would exclude any of the more recent signers who have terrible signatures because they literally would scar up a great ball with nothing but nice signatures.

Personally, I would start a second ball with the more recent players so that you don't even need to think about this as a consideration.
I actually have done this with certain theme balls that I have worked on completing.

Zach Wheat 03-07-2016 04:46 PM

500 HR Ball
 
Thanks for the info guys. I think I am going to leave As Is. I have the following on the ball:

Williams
Mantle
Mays
Aaron
Banks
McCovey
Robinson
Killebrew
Jackson
Schmidt

Last name slips me....I think it is Mathews.

I don't want to start an heated discussion here...but would Griffey & Pujols belong in the User or Non-User club? Just curious on thoughts...

Z

Scott Garner 03-07-2016 04:48 PM

Griffey, Jr. = not a user
Pujols = no opinion

ooo-ribay 03-07-2016 04:49 PM

We'll probably never know.

Rookiemonster 03-07-2016 05:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ooo-ribay (Post 1512721)
This is what drives me crazy.....the assumption that certain guys are clean. I would love to see Piazza start his HOF speech with, "Guess what?"

I absolutely agree with this . Just get another ball with all the other guys on it .

packs 03-08-2016 10:27 AM

I don't think it's too hard to tell who cheated. Ramirez was suspended. Palmeiro was caught red handed. McGwire and Sosa are obvious. Sheffield admitted using the same cream that Bonds did. Ortiz is the only questionable name I listed. I guess you guys are just fans of someone.

Scott Garner 03-08-2016 11:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by packs (Post 1513037)
I don't think it's too hard to tell who cheated. Ramirez was suspended. Palmeiro was caught red handed. McGwire and Sosa are obvious. Sheffield admitted using the same cream that Bonds did. Ortiz is the only questionable name I listed. I guess you guys are just fans of someone.

Ortiz has been on a list of PED users

JMEnglish27 03-08-2016 12:05 PM

Maybe use a time cutoff for it. All the guys who reached 500 HR before 1990. Something like that doesn't bring to mind the negatives.

Then start a 1990 on ball.

Zach Wheat 03-08-2016 02:17 PM

500 HR Ball
 
Others have suggested using pre-2000 as an arbitrary cut off year for admittance into the Non-Steroid Era 500 HR Club . Ten of the 27 members made it into the 500 HR Club after that cut off date - and most of the 10 seem to be implicated in some fashion - in using steroids.

I am still not sure about Pujols - and no I am not particularly a fan of his. I am a fan of Miguel Cabrera - and hope he makes it some day. That would be a feat playing at the cavernous Comerica Park.

Z

Scott Garner 03-08-2016 04:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zach Wheat (Post 1513129)
Others have suggested using pre-2000 as an arbitrary cut off year for admittance into the Non-Steroid Era 500 HR Club . Ten of the 27 members made it into the 500 HR Club after that cut off date - and most of the 10 seem to be implicated in some fashion - in using steroids.

I am still not sure about Pujols - and no I am not particularly a fan of his. I am a fan of Miguel Cabrera - and hope he makes it some day. That would be a feat playing at the cavernous Comerica Park.

Z

I agree about Miguel Cabrera and Pujols, FWIW

Bruinsfan94 03-08-2016 05:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by packs (Post 1512682)
I'd add the clean guys like Frank Thomas, Albert Pujols, Jim Thome, and Ken Griffey Jr. But I' d leave off Manny Ramirez, McGwire, Sosa, Palmeiro, Sheffield, and Ortiz.

How in the world can you say Pujols is clean and Ortiz is not with any degree of certainty?

rocuan 03-11-2016 06:58 PM

500 HR Ball
 
I have one, signed at the 500 HR show in Atlantic City. Williams, Aaron, Mantle. Mathews, Killebrew, F, Robinson, Banks, McCovey, Mays, Schmidt signed at the show. Jackson was there but did not sign due to a severe hand injury. I got his signature at a later show. Also got Murray's at another show. I would not get any others to sign it. It has a COA from JSA.
It is now for sale if interested.

ooo-ribay 03-11-2016 10:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bruinsfan94 (Post 1513192)
How in the world can you say Pujols is clean and Ortiz is not with any degree of certainty?

Hello? You can't. No more than you can be sure about Griffey, Piazza or ANYBODY!!!!!

Stonepony 03-12-2016 01:02 PM

Leave the ball as is. Do you really want any modern players sig squeezing around your others?

perezfan 03-12-2016 09:57 PM

Agree! Put it in a holder and glue it shut (should the temptation re-occur).

Leave that thing exactly as-is!

icollectDCsports 03-12-2016 10:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by perezfan (Post 1514758)
Agree! Put it in a holder and glue it shut (should the temptation re-occur).

Leave that thing exactly as-is!

Yep, and the more it's exposed to oils and dirt from hands, the greater the risk to the condition of the ball.

csotus 03-12-2016 10:52 PM

I would love to see a picture of your ball, sounds amazing

earlywynnfan 03-13-2016 07:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bruinsfan94 (Post 1513192)
How in the world can you say Pujols is clean and Ortiz is not with any degree of certainty?

Maybe because Ortiz actually failed a drug test??

Scott Garner 03-13-2016 09:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by earlywynnfan (Post 1514806)
Maybe because Ortiz actually failed a drug test??

;)

Bruinsfan94 03-13-2016 09:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by earlywynnfan (Post 1514806)
Maybe because Ortiz actually failed a drug test??

That list was a joke. We have zero idea what it was he tested for. It could be something that is not banned, was never banned, or anything really. He's among the most tested players out there. You are going to ruin a guys legacy over something shady and unproven like that.

ooo-ribay 03-13-2016 01:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bruinsfan94 (Post 1513192)
How in the world can you say Pujols is clean and Ortiz is not with any degree of certainty?

I took this to mean "how can you say Pujols is clean?" And, really, you can't.

yanks12025 03-13-2016 02:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bruinsfan94 (Post 1514840)
That list was a joke. We have zero idea what it was he tested for. It could be something that is not banned, was never banned, or anything really. He's among the most tested players out there. You are going to ruin a guys legacy over something shady and unproven like that.

Sorry but how many times a player is tested means NOTHING. Look what happened two years. A BUNCH of players got caught cheating, A-rod, Cruz, etc and none of them failed a test years ago.

Also A-rod was on the same 2003 list as Ortiz. Im sure if A-rod didn't come out and admit he took PEDs back in 2008 when it came out, you Red Sox fans would still call him a cheater knowing he failed the 03 test. Living up here in Boston, I have learned one thing when it comes to Boston sports fans. If their player is caught cheating, they will deny and make ANY excuse for that player. But if another teams player has cheated, they boo and scream and never let them forget it.

Zach Wheat 03-13-2016 02:57 PM

500 HR Ball
 
2 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by csotus (Post 1514767)
I would love to see a picture of your ball, sounds amazing

Here it is...

bnorth 03-13-2016 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zach Wheat (Post 1514936)
Here it is...

WOW awesome baseball. I would leave it exactly like it is.

Scott Garner 03-13-2016 05:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bnorth (Post 1514972)
WOW awesome baseball. I would leave it exactly like it is.

Absolutely!

earlywynnfan 03-13-2016 07:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bnorth (Post 1514972)
WOW awesome baseball. I would leave it exactly like it is.

agreed!!!

almostdone 03-13-2016 08:05 PM

What a great, clean example. Absolutely leave it as is. The only possible way way to improve it is to send to Florida and get Ruth and Ott to sign it;)
Drew

ooo-ribay 03-14-2016 04:03 PM

I'm no autograph expert but I am a Giants guy and that McCovey looks off. The Williams, too. Is it just me? :confused:


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:18 PM.