|
User titles on the new board...lets have some fun
Posted By: <b>leon</b><p>OK, lets have some fun with one of the options on the new board. There is a place to put titles relative to the number of posts you make. Right now they are at a default of <br><br>0.. to.. 149 posts.. JR.Member<br>150.. to.. 1500 posts.. Member<br>1501/+.. posts.. Sr.Member<br><br><br>This is one of the things everyone was asking (when can I not be a Jr.Member?)<br>Except for Administrator, Moderator and Forum Owner anything can be a title......So lets see what everyone wants and we can go from there...I would say about 5-10 levels is how many we will want.....but it's very open right now....<br><br>
|
User titles on the new board...lets have some fun
Posted By: <b>Phil</b><p>0-100: Single A<br>101-200: Double A<br>201-500: Triple A<br>501-1000: Rookie<br>1001-5000: All-Star<br>5000+: HOF<br><br>Just a thought........
|
User titles on the new board...lets have some fun
Posted By: <b>Matt</b><p>For levels, we could do baseball related (i.e. "A Player","AA Player",AAA, Majors, HOFer, etc.) or vintage baseball card related (anything from "T206 User" to a "4 Base Hits User"); I'd imagine that last one will need some discussion <img src="/images/happy.gif" height="14" width="14" alt="happy.gif"><br><br>ETA - Phil beat me to the first option.
|
User titles on the new board...lets have some fun
Posted By: <b>Phil</b><p>Yeah, I meant to add HOFer.<br><br>Maybe in my post, you change Veteran to All-Star<br>and All-Star to HOFer<br><br>I'll edit the first post
|
User titles on the new board...lets have some fun
Posted By: <b>Anthony S.</b><p>5000 edits = A Cycleback<br><br>just a thought.
|
User titles on the new board...lets have some fun
Posted By: <b>barrysloate</b><p>I would like to become a Grand High Exalted Mystic Ruler...like Morris Fink!
|
User titles on the new board...lets have some fun
Posted By: <b>Matt</b><p>Barry - is that the low or high end of your scale?
|
User titles on the new board...lets have some fun
Posted By: <b>Matt</b><p>we could use T206 player values - Abbattichio at the low end to Wagner at the high end or T206 back scarcity - Piedmont on up...
|
User titles on the new board...lets have some fun
Posted By: <b>barrysloate</b><p>Matt- haven't figured that out yet. And it's a pop culture reference- can you identify it?
|
User titles on the new board...lets have some fun
Posted By: <b>Matt</b><p>Google tells me I'm not old enough to know the source of that reference.
|
User titles on the new board...lets have some fun
Posted By: <b>andy becker</b><p>0.. to.. 149 posts.. armpit<br>150.. to.. 1500 posts.. Post-pubescent armpit<br>1501/+.. posts.. hairy armpit w/scent
|
User titles on the new board...lets have some fun
Posted By: <b>barrysloate</b><p>Hint: it's from the 1955-56 television season.
|
User titles on the new board...lets have some fun
Posted By: <b>Matt</b><p>Barry - I know - that's why I said I'm not old enough - but, one of these days...
|
User titles on the new board...lets have some fun
Posted By: <b>barrysloate</b><p>Okay, you got me...but I'm not old enough either (I was three years old in 1955). <img src="/images/happy.gif" height="14" width="14" alt="happy.gif">
|
User titles on the new board...lets have some fun
Posted By: <b>leon</b><p>So would the Group start out as a Penultimate user? Then, since that is really the 2nd to last (by definition) he could work his way up to being the last...
|
User titles on the new board...lets have some fun
Posted By: <b>Jim VB</b><p>Barry, <br><br>I was unaware that you were a member of the Brotherhood of Racoons!
|
User titles on the new board...lets have some fun
Posted By: <b>Matt</b><p>Leon - how about a Benjamin Button approach - you start out as an "expert", and as you post more and more you realize you know less then you thought you did and eventually end up a "novice" or "ignoramus."
|
User titles on the new board...lets have some fun
Posted By: <b>leon</b><p>That's an every day occurrence...We can't go with that...<br><br>btw, so far I like Phils post about what they should be....but we could also go for type of hits...single, double, triple, HR, grand slam.....then the cycle....
|
User titles on the new board...lets have some fun
Posted By: <b>barrysloate</b><p>Woo-woo...woo-woo!
|
User titles on the new board...lets have some fun
Posted By: <b>Matt</b><p>these are user titles, so they should describe a user - I think having the titles "Single User" "Double User" is confusing, although I'm not sure "Piedmont User" and "Uzit User" make much more sense...<br><br>ETA - actually I think The Group should be perpetually stuck at "Double User"
|
User titles on the new board...lets have some fun
Posted By: <b>JimCrandell</b><p>I would vote for not including this at all--it was one of the things I did not like about the "new board".
|
User titles on the new board...lets have some fun
Posted By: <b>barrysloate</b><p>I'm not sure we really do need to be rated based on the number of posts, like the stars you get with ebay. Also, if I'm at say 145 posts and I'm close to the next level, I might do 5 "bumps" just to speed up my promotion. You know, I've got no patience whatsoever.
|
User titles on the new board...lets have some fun
Posted By: <b>Matt</b><p>Barry/Jim - I tend to agree on this - I'm not a fan of rankings based on post count - you could have a Peter Chao come in and rack up the posts and be a "Hall of Famer" and then have some very knowledgeable lurkers who post very rarely (say DoctorDave in the E121 discussion) be "Rookies." <br>Much more telling to me (but also with it's flaws) is how long someone has been a forum member, and that's already displayed with every post.
|
User titles on the new board...lets have some fun
Posted By: <b>Jim VB</b><p>Since I've been accused of being a socialist, I might as well go all the way. Everybody, except for the moderators, should be equal. <br><br>(And Lichtman should start "sharing" more of his cards (and I don't mean images!) My mailing address is available on request.)
|
User titles on the new board...lets have some fun
Posted By: <b>JimCrandell</b><p>I agree Matt--I don't have a problem with how long someone has been a forum member.
|
User titles on the new board...lets have some fun
Posted By: <b>Jason L</b><p>I would like to be known as the "Thread Killer" since I actually write the last, most irrelevant and least helpful post on a disproportionate number of our threads...or perhaps, I could just be known as "Crickets" for the silence after my poorly conceived and executed jokes.<br><br>although I do like the use of penultimate...perhaps I should become "The Amazing Penultimate Something!"<br>but that sounds more like a Superhero seeking self-aggrandizement.<br><br>honestly, though...I don't think the idea of ranking the writers is a great one - promotes activity for activity's sake....unless I'm first, then it's just cool and I'm getting a jacket made up!
|
User titles on the new board...lets have some fun
Posted By: <b>Todd</b><p>0-100: Piedmont <br>101-200: Polar Bear<br>201-500: Cycle<br>501-750: Hindu <br>751-1000: Carolina Brights<br>1001-2500: Broadleaf<br>2500-5000: Uzit<br>5000+: Ty Cobb <br><br><br><br><br>just a thought<br>
|
User titles on the new board...lets have some fun
Posted By: <b>barrysloate</b><p>No Lenox?
|
User titles on the new board...lets have some fun
Posted By: <b>Matt</b><p>No Coupon?
|
User titles on the new board...lets have some fun
Posted By: <b>Todd</b><p>I know there are others....perhaps make the levels easier to obtain the other backs<br><br><br>Lenox<br>Old Mill<br>Caporal<br>American Beauty<br>El Principe<br>Sovereign<br>etc
|
User titles on the new board...lets have some fun
Posted By: <b>Jeff Lichtman</b><p>Underprint?
|
User titles on the new board...lets have some fun
Posted By: <b>Robert Dixon</b><p>I don't see why you guys would not want this feature. We all know that posting more doesn't make you more knowledgable. It's just for fun. I like the A, AA, AAA, etc. idea.
|
User titles on the new board...lets have some fun
Posted By: <b>Todd</b><p>0-100: Piedmont <br>101-200: Sweet Caporal<br>201-300: Polar Bear<br>301-400: Sovereign<br>401-500: Old Mill<br>501-600: El Principe<br>601-700: American Beauty <br>701-800: Cycle<br>801-900: Hindu<br>901-1000: Tolstoi <br>1001-1100: Carolina Brights <br>1101-1250: Broadleaf <br>1251-1500: Lenox<br>1501-2000: Uzit <br>2001-3000: Drum<br>3000+: Ty Cobb <br>
|
User titles on the new board...lets have some fun
Posted By: <b>barry arnold</b><p>Please believe me, I am for fun, even though i'm a year older than Barry Sloate.<br>I have been on a board or two that had individuals who vociferously maintained that those who didn't post frequently were truly not committed to the board and did not want to<br>experience collegiality or be friends. I have found that competitiveness can<br>become pathological even on the best of boards.Obviously, I tend to be one who posts less often than some unless the precious topic T206 arises, then I'm a wee bit crazy.<br><br>Having offered this caution, I would be happy to jump to the new board and become a rookie or whatever esteemed title I receive. I am just grateful to<br>have buds who love these beloved cards as much as I do and who continue to teach me. I am also very grateful that there are colleagues willing to create our board and provide the fine leadership.<br><br>best,<br><br>barry
|
User titles on the new board...lets have some fun
Posted By: <b>Rob D.</b><p>I'm sure there would be debate about whether it would be a low-level ranking or a high one, but I think "Legendary" has a nice ring to it.
|
User titles on the new board...lets have some fun
Posted By: <b>Todd</b><p>I do agree that members would starting bumping or giving short comments on posts just to increase their number to get to the next level.
|
User titles on the new board...lets have some fun
Posted By: <b>Greg Ecklund</b><p>0-100: Rube<br>101-200: Bucketfoot<br>201-500: Hoosier Thunderbolt<br>501-1000: Duke of Tralee<br>1001-2000: Flying Dutchman<br>2001-3000: Iron Horse<br>3001-4000: Big Six<br>4001-5000: Sultan of Swat<br>5001+: Georgia Peach
|
User titles on the new board...lets have some fun
Posted By: <b>MJ</b><p>haha I love this thread - I'm voting for the rare backs as the basis of the titles...as for numbered posts for the backs, I'll leave it up to ya'll.<br><br>I like Todd's breakdown of:<br><br><br>0-100: Piedmont<br>101-200: Sweet Caporal<br>201-300: Polar Bear<br>301-400: Sovereign<br>401-500: Old Mill<br>501-600: El Principe<br>601-700: American Beauty<br>701-800: Cycle<br>801-900: Hindu<br>901-1000: Tolstoi<br>1001-1100: Carolina Brights<br>1101-1250: Broadleaf<br>1251-1500: Lenox<br>1501-2000: Uzit<br>2001-3000: Drum<br>3000+: Ty Cobb
|
User titles on the new board...lets have some fun
Posted By: <b>JDRUM</b><p>Well if you have to lose out to someone for the the top spot, I guess Ty Cobb is ok.
|
User titles on the new board...lets have some fun
Posted By: <b>leon</b><p>So here is what we can do for this one....easy enough....Since there seems to be some good reasons not to do titles associated with the number of posts I will leave it the way it is right now. So everyone will be a jr.member to start....We will quickly do a formal poll on the new board and see how it goes. I think even a small majority in favor of having the titles would not be enough to have them. In other words if say, 35% didn't want them, then I think that is enough to not do them...however, if 80% want them then I think we go that way. I am fairly neutral on the whole subject and just thought it could be fun. The posts will be counted on the new board anyway though......with or without title....Not a big deal to me...best regards
|
User titles on the new board...lets have some fun
Posted By: <b>Greg Ecklund</b><p>I was pretty close to making Sultan of Swat the top title - if we used player nicknames and that one was top I couldn't really argue. <br><br>I much prefer player nicknames to the T206 backs though...it better represents the entire sport that we collect rather than a single set (and frankly a single set that bores me a bit - no offense T206 collectors).<br><br>Edited to add:<br><br>I really can't understand why instead of having fun with something like titles, people feel the need to raise objections or scenarios why they are a bad idea. Seriously...if someone bumps threads just to raise their post count it will be obvious to everyone and will only expose that poster as a total dork.<br><br>
|
User titles on the new board...lets have some fun
Posted By: <b>quan</b><p>you can go with post counts correlating to the different eras...<br><br>19th century sandlot/cap anson<br>deadball era/ty cobb<br>ruthian years/babe ruth<br>golden age/joe d or ted williams<br>???60-80s forgotten years/nolan ryan???<br>steroid age/bonds or selig<br><br>the more you post the more disconnect there is to the board's main theme...IRONY! or you can go all benjamin button and work backward era-wise.<br>
|
User titles on the new board...lets have some fun
Posted By: <b>whitehse</b><p>Do people have too much time on their hands to take something that is just plain fun on a message board and turn it into a discussion on the theory of post bumping and how that will be bad for the board. Come on guys...loosen up! <br><br>If someone is post bumping should we really care? I believe the new board had a "ignore" feature that you can use to ignore a poster. Lets get over ourselves and look at the new board like a shiney new pickup truck that is meant to be driven and the new features meant to be played with!! Lets get over ourselves and remember we are all talking about a hobby here and the message board that goes with that hobby...not life and death! <br><br>Geez!
|
User titles on the new board...lets have some fun
Posted By: <b>JimCrandell</b><p>In my opinion, board is silly enough as it is and does not need to be even more so--I think it detracts from being able to have discussions on serious subjects such as the couple that were on the board recently. Count on a number of threads about who is what kind of member and post building comments to increase ones "stature". Net effect will be to keep serious posters away.<br><br>Just my opinion.<br><br>Jim<br><br>
|
User titles on the new board...lets have some fun
Posted By: <b>Matt</b><p>I think if we stay away from terms like "Junior" "Senior" "Expert" "Novice" etc. then there isn't much of a stature issue. I don't see anyone feeling upset that they are a Tolstoi back and not yet a Carolina Brights. <br><br><p><br><br><br><a href="http://picasaweb.google.com/mwieder" rel="nofollow">My Trade/Sale Page</a></p>
|
User titles on the new board...lets have some fun
Posted By: <b>Joe D.</b><p>"So everyone will be a jr.member to start.."<br><br>Its bad enough that my wife knows about my junior member status...<br>does the entire message board have to know too?
|
User titles on the new board...lets have some fun
Posted By: <b>Greg Ecklund</b><p>So having fun on a board devoted to a hobby that is supposed to be fun should be deadly serious at all times? In between posts about grading scams, deceptive auction house practices, and dissertations about contract law I think we sometimes forget why we started collecting in the first place.<br><br>If anything Jim it is your post that is not serious...it shows a complete inability to discern what subjects are worthy of serious discussion and which are not. In fact, the only way for your post to be less serious would be if you posted it while wearing a clown wig and a red nose.
|
User titles on the new board...lets have some fun
Posted By: <b>leon</b><p>Nice one....<br><br>And even though I said I am neutral, and to that effect won't cast a formal vote, I think it could be fun. Maybe we can have a poll on what percentage constitutes enough of a percentage to have the titles? And maybe we can have a poll to do a poll. <br><br>Jim C. - to me the idea of collecting is to have fun, mainly. Who really cares if a few guys want to make it to Broadleaf 460 instead of Carolina Brights, and oh my gosh, have a thread about? I think we might have to close the board down for good if that happens. Or if they want to go from double AA to triple AAA? It's freaking baseball cards we are collecting not embryonic research. But most importantly you can have your opinion and cast your vote.
|
User titles on the new board...lets have some fun
Posted By: <b>Anthony S.</b><p>When a new user figures out how to post their first message on the new board, we could say they "Lost their Crand-inity."
|
User titles on the new board...lets have some fun
Posted By: <b>Greg Ecklund</b><p>If we use the T206 back designations as titles I would propose that Polar Bears not be allowed to vote<br><br>I'm all for animal rights, but I would draw the line at suffrage
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:56 PM. |