Rogers, Jones and Williams are registration issues, not actual cropping differences.
Quote:
|
Don’t disagree at all. Most of the cards posted in this thread are just recurring print defects of one kind or another.
|
Quote:
That is true, however, every so often we are exposed to a nugget. I’ve been out of commission for a while but came out of hiding to share this 1960 Morrell crop variation of good ‘ol Charlie Neal (see scoreboard in background). In the same set I have also seen crop variations of the Furillo (backstop poles), the Alston (yellow steps/number of fans in seats), the Moon (player jersey number/number of arches), and Koufax (size of flag pole tower). https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201...120bb8e38a.jpg Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Seeing red
1 Attachment(s)
Not sure if I put this one up or not after looking through over half the post to find it I gave up. Here is an interesting one of the red birds.
|
That's a true red bird card. Anyone know if that was a DP card. I have seen one seller pointing out a recuring cropping difference on that and other 61 cards in which there is a spacing difference between the names and team designations, or in this case the names and the title
|
Just picked up this partial red pass on Pete Rose:
https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/G8cAA...dlm/s-l800.jpg |
I am not a graded collector but if a card was otherwise a 10 what deduction would it get for such a print defect, if any ?
|
Kind of a grader's discretion. If they consider it a "print defect", it would get a PSA 9 (PD) and count the same for the registry as a 7. If the submitter requested no qualifiers, it could drop even lower. Or it could stay a 10 if the grader doesn't think it's a print defect.
|
2 Attachment(s)
Quote:
Also found this 68 Cap Patterson with tons of extra blue.....his left arm just blends in with the sky. |
1961 #393
1 Attachment(s)
Here is a similar item to the card above only with Cubs. Over printing?
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:26 AM. |