|
Puckett early auto
1 Attachment(s)
A friend of mine obtained this Puckett auto early in his rookie year. I was wondering if the team here thinks it would pass a PSA certification... or any thoughts of legitimacy you think?
|
I'm going to say NO based on the 'K'. It is very rare for someone to completely change from an innie to an outtie. That being said, if anyone has a verified "early rookie year" signature that proves otherwise, I'd be very interested in seeing it. It is rare, but not out of the question.
BTW, I don't like the 'irby Puckett' either. :) |
I like it, sloppy but good
|
I know that this isn't an answer to what your asking (or maybe it is, tangentally), but it doesn't look like that is a legitimate autograph.
|
I received autographs in person from Kirby from 1984 to shortly before his death and I am almost positive it is good. It is definately from early in his career - probably from 1984 but I think it's good. He changed his autograph a number of times throughout his career.
|
I think it is good as well.
|
kirby
The signature is real. My question is why does it matter if PSA will authenticate it ?
|
Quote:
|
Can anyone post an "early" example?
|
Quote:
|
I'm not an expert but have seen a lot of Puckett autographs being from MN. At quick glance, it does look like early Puckett autos I have seen. I am a little more familiar with his more recent signature. I wish I had some confirmed mid 80's autos to look at as a reference as well. As another poster mentioned, his auto evolved quite a bit through out the years.
|
Quote:
|
I stand 100% corrected. I say it would pass at psa
|
Quote:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/KIRBY-PUCKET...item3cbf91ec39 Like I said, rare, but not unheard of. Huge difference, but no less AUTHENTIC. |
This is good and will pass all day and twice on Sunday. I have had many like this and early signatures like this are always good to pick.
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:27 PM. |