Quote:
Hey Glenn I don't quite understand your comment....please explain ? ? TED Z |
Certainly. In the original post you said you were basing the determination of uniqueness on the numbers in "the Pop Reports." Then David said "neither PSA nor SGC list any [BL 350 Quinns] in their pop report." Thus, he owns 1 of a card which, according to the method you cited, has a population of zero. That's all.
|
Glenn
Perhaps, I was not clear in my original post here. Or, you may be misconstruing the meaning the word "unique" as I have applied it here. I'm not basing the "uniqueness" of a given T206 on Pop report data. I simply refer to the Pop report data as possible supporting evidence. The basis for me saying a certain T206 is unique is strictly based my 37 years of experience collecting T206's. For example....I have never before seen the McGraw and Herzog with UZIT backs. Furthermore, I have contacted many veteran T206 collectors, who told me that they have not either. Therefore, in my opinion it's fair to conclude that these two T206's are unique (at this point in time). Sure, 2nd's (or 3rd's) of these guys may eventually surface. But, as of March 10, 2017 these two T206's remain unique. TED Z . |
|
Show us your "unique" (1 of 1) T206 cards.
3 Attachment(s)
|
I'll throw into this mix a T206 proof.....unique, or what ?
http://photos.imageevent.com/tedzan7...manPROOFbb.jpg TED Z . |
Love those proof. I've got to get me one someday. :cool:
|
4 Attachment(s)
Quote:
This is how the pop reports get out of whack. David probably had the Herzog crossed over. Attachment 265312Attachment 265313 He did the same thing with a Conroy Drum and who knows how many other low pop cards. Attachment 265314Attachment 265315 |
Quote:
http://www.robertedwardauctions.com/...-only-example/ |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:02 AM. |