Autograph 101 is the worst. Half the stuff up there are fake, half the people there are clueless. I disagree with the notion they care about the hobby, they just care about how much money they can get for the sig...real or fake be damn.
|
Quote:
And let's not forget about the lawsuit revolving around members of that community. It's amazing that anyone has stuck around in that group after this: https://www.sportscollectorsdaily.co...uge-penalties/ Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
I enjoy Autographs 101. Like most other groups, including this one, has a few dumbasses, multiple entertaining and knowledgeable peeps, and a lot that fall in between those extremes.
|
I enjoyed it also, partially for all the fakes veing sold, until I called out an altered Ruth signature that was being sold. JSA, who even certed the cut, agreed it was altered after bringing it to their attention. BOOM, immediatly banned after starting this thread for noting the facts (not opinions, facts) of the signature.
That is what is wrong with teenagers/20 year old kids running the hroup. They think that since they are on the internet, there is no consquences for their actions. |
Personally, I think all cut autographs should be treated like trimmed cards. Full value only if it's on a full page, full index cards, etc.
|
I agree! I'm not a fan of cut sigs.
|
Man, that dinner program was such an awesome piece. It's really sad someone cut it up.
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:00 AM. |