Net54baseball.com Forums

Net54baseball.com Forums (http://www.net54baseball.com/index.php)
-   Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions (http://www.net54baseball.com/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   O/T....Why has the Rock-n-Roll HOF snubbed CHICAGO ? (http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=158949)

tedzan 11-16-2012 09:30 AM

O/T....Why has the Rock-n-Roll HOF snubbed CHICAGO ?
 
Since we are taking polls on such irrelevant topics as legalizing "Mary-Jane"...... then I think this subject is worthy of discussion on this forum,
especially since the R & R HOF this month is permitting the populace to participate in voting for the 2013 inductees into the R & R HOF.

Anyhow, I have followed "Rock" ever since Bill Haley & the Comets' "Rock Around The Clock"....circa 1954.

My all-time favorite band is CHICAGO. They started with this classic 1st album of their's in 1969....The Chicago Transit Authority


http://i1255.photobucket.com/albums/...bumchicago.jpg
Notable Songs...... “Beginnings,” “Saturday In The Park,” “Feeling Stronger Everyday,” “Just You ‘N’ Me,” “Call On Me,” “You’re The Inspiration",
“If You Leave Me Now,” “Baby What A Big Surprise,” “Hard To Say I’m Sorry”

Which includes their 2 signature Songs "Does Anybody Really Know What Time It Is ?" & “25 or 6 to 4". The meaning of this song remained
a mystery to me for many years. Several years ago, Frank Wakefield clarified the significance of "25 or 6 to 4".


Whatever, today's question to any of you......Why isn't this tremendous Jazz-Rock group in the R & R HOF ?

Furthermore, why not the.....Doobie Brothers, or Hall & Oates, or Kiss, or Three Dog Night.....or other great Rock groups ? ?


T-Rex TED

HRBAKER 11-16-2012 09:57 AM

I'm guessing it has to do with Peter Cetera's
hairdo.

Edit to Add: CTA is one of my fave albums. Past that
not too much.

wolf441 11-16-2012 09:59 AM

Doobie Brothers
 
Ted,

You could have just started this post with The Doobie Brothers and combined it with the legalizing pot thread!

Leon 11-16-2012 10:11 AM

I have seen Chicago 3 times, 2 of them with original members, and they were absolutely awesome in concert. Not sure why they aren't in the Rock and Roll HOF....

Robextend 11-16-2012 10:13 AM

I can't believe they aren't in...thats really weird. Also Neil Diamond isn't in...another joke in my opinion.

lug-nut 11-16-2012 10:22 AM

i'm not old enough to remember all of chicago's songs but i do know their hits and i'm not sure they made a big enough impact on music which is one of the requirements to getting in as well as the others you mentioned.

kiss on the other hand i think made a huge impact with their antics, make up, big stage shows with the fire, blood and what-not, but i dont think their music had the quality. but i do like their music since it's borderline heavy metal.

with that said, seeing some of the other bands they let in, chicago and kiss should be inducted...hall 'n oates and doobie bros, 3 dogs and a cat...not so sure

bunst 11-16-2012 10:34 AM

My two favorite bands Jethro Tull and Rush are both not in...makes absolutely no sense when consider how much of an impact they have had in Rock 'n Roll and their longevity. And if anyone didn't know, Geddy Lee (Rush) is a major collector of baseball memorabilia.

drc 11-16-2012 12:09 PM

Rock 'N Roll HOF is for loser commercial bands. I'd be embarrassed if one of my favorite bands ever made it. Luckily, I don't think Discharge is on the short list.

Actually, it's true. I take Rock N Roll Hall of Fame very unseriously. And with quite a bit of disdain and sneering. I rank it up there as an idea with a Rock N Roll Amusement Park and the Rock N Roll Wax Museum. Voting by the public? Ooooh, that's makes it that much more legitimate. Can't wait for Backtreet Boys' induction.

tedzan 11-16-2012 12:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Leon (Post 1053239)
I have seen Chicago 3 times, 2 of them with original members, and they were absolutely awesome in concert. Not sure why they aren't in the Rock and Roll HOF....

Leon

Your...."absolutely awesome in concert"....best describes the experience of seeing Chicago perform.

I saw the original guys in the 1970's at the Nassau Coliseum (NY). The modern group in the 1990's at the Valley Forge Music Fair.....TREMENDOUS !


TED Z

nolemmings 11-16-2012 12:16 PM

Dialogue is one of my favorite songs from any band. Terry Kath left us way too soon :( And yes, Chicago's contributions to music were more than enough to earn them enshrinement.

glynparson 11-16-2012 12:17 PM

i think
 
had they continued to make records as good as their first they would have been a shoe in. Many critics see them as incredibly talented but also see them as sell-outs.

Robextend 11-16-2012 12:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by drc (Post 1053287)
Actually, it's true. I take Rock N Roll Hall of Fame very unseriously. And with quite a bit of disdain and sneering. I rank it up there as an idea with a Rock N Roll Amusement Park and the Rock N Roll Wax Museum. Voting by the public? Ooooh, that's makes it that much more legitimate. Can't wait for Backtreet Boys' induction.

+1, well said...

Peter_Spaeth 11-16-2012 01:10 PM

Most likely because Jann Wenner doesn't like them.

Runscott 11-16-2012 01:14 PM

I don't like Rush or Neil Diamond, but they, along with Chicago, should be in the HOF.

Sounds like it's even more full of bullshit than baseball's HOF.

tedzan 11-16-2012 01:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 1053320)
Most likely because Jann Wenner doesn't like them.

Peter

I know of Wenner (and, his politics); but, what does that have to do with Chicago not being in the R-n-R HOF ?


TED Z

drc 11-16-2012 01:44 PM

The Rock 'n Roll exists to make money. It's not as there was a pressing public need to give The Beatles, the Rolling Stones or Black Sabbath more attention and awards. They are having the public vote not because they think it will produce better selection, but for $$ and exposure-- which right there makes a selection illegitimate from the start.

There's nothing wrong with that stuff, I suppose. Just don't expect me to to take it seriously.

And, for the record, there are bands in the HOF that I like and think are good. I'm not saying that being inducted means a band sucks.

Runscott 11-16-2012 01:53 PM

Turn off your computer and go get on the bus

jcmtiger 11-16-2012 08:51 PM

Actually the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame should be in Detroit anyway, not Cleveland.:D

Peter_Spaeth 11-16-2012 08:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tedzan (Post 1053326)
Peter

I know of Wenner (and, his politics); but, what does that have to do with Chicago not being in the R-n-R HOF ?


TED Z


I believe he had some feud with the band or its manager, and it is claimed that he is very influential in terms of who gets in. Google Chicago Hall of Fame Wenner and you will see what I mean.

ethicsprof 11-16-2012 09:06 PM

chicago
 
I saw them perform when i was an undergraduate---1970 or so--- and have loved them ever since. They should definitely be in the HOF.
all the best,
barry

packs 11-16-2012 09:12 PM

Hall and Oates rules!

jdmeltz 11-17-2012 04:21 AM

Neil Diamond was inducted into the R&R HOF last year. He gave a notable acceptance speech:
"I have no idea where we are… What are we doing here? What the heck is going on right here?”

buymycards 11-17-2012 05:20 AM

Chicago
 
Love Chicago. Just the lead guitar playing in 25 or 6 to 4 should be enough to put them in.

Ladder7 11-17-2012 05:40 AM

Worthy, When we were adolescents, the machos considered them a chick band, ala LRB and Barry White. But a necessary 8 track for the glovey. Agreed, everyone loved the Doobies x 10 (prior to Michael Mc)

Also for consideration; Grand Funk, Yes, Kansas, Derek and the Dominos, Boston, Rick Derringer, Foreigner, J Geils, Styx and all the others on my playlist.

tedzan 11-17-2012 05:47 AM

Check out this link for the "politics" behind why certain Rock groups (or individuals) have been snubbed by the R-n-R HOF........

http://www.futurerocklegends.com/blo...ry-snubbed.php

Thanks, Peter S.


TED Z

E93 11-17-2012 06:46 AM

Not a comment on who is in, but I had an absolute blast when I visited the R&R HOF about ten years ago.

David,
I think you are safe with Discharge. There was a display on Punk but it was admittedly one of the weaker spots.

JimB

E93 11-17-2012 06:48 AM

P.S. A friend of mine from grad school (He did his Ph.d. in Art History) and former member of Del Fuegos, Warren Zane, used to be a curator there. Not sure if he still is. We've lost touch over the years.
JimB

Bpm0014 11-17-2012 08:10 AM

Hall and Oates should definitely be in. Most successful duo in the history of music. And I think they are in the top 15 of the highest revenue grossing artists of all time. Unbelievable talents.

Robextend 11-17-2012 08:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jdmeltz (Post 1053501)
Neil Diamond was inducted into the R&R HOF last year. He gave a notable acceptance speech:
"I have no idea where we are… What are we doing here? What the heck is going on right here?”

Nice!!

Peter_Spaeth 11-17-2012 08:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by buymycards (Post 1053503)
Love Chicago. Just the lead guitar playing in 25 or 6 to 4 should be enough to put them in.

Reportedly, Jimi Hendrix said that Terry Kath was better than he was.

barrysloate 11-17-2012 09:28 AM

How come the Fugs aren't in the Hall of Fame?

HRBAKER 11-17-2012 09:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jdmeltz (Post 1053501)
Neil Diamond was inducted into the R&R HOF last year. He gave a notable acceptance speech:
"I have no idea where we are… What are we doing here? What the heck is going on right here?”

Certainly he should have had no idea what he was doing there.

MVSNYC 11-17-2012 10:26 AM

O/T from the O/T
 
Side note- there's an awesome new Rolling Stones doc on HBO, called Crossfire Hurricane, focuses on their first 20 years...sex, drugs, rock & roll.

ps- biggest R&R HOF void, IMO- Depeche Mode, just sayin'

GregMitch34 11-17-2012 12:34 PM

Is Jim Kaat in that one yet?

bmarlowe1 11-17-2012 12:34 PM

Innovative, technically excellent, and wrote a fair number of good songs. Well written and executed arrangements. Kath was an early shredder and was ahead of his time. Cetera's bass playing was tremendous - too bad his career then went in a different direction. Saw them twice with original members in Champaign and in Chicago.

Robextend 11-17-2012 01:06 PM

How come the Archies aren't in? :)

kcohen 11-17-2012 02:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by barrysloate (Post 1053546)
How come the Fugs aren't in the Hall of Fame?


My English teacher in high school in 1966 or so brought the Fugs First Album in to class and played it for us.

Carpe Diem

Brian Van Horn 11-17-2012 02:40 PM

I can't figure out why Chicago isn't in unless it's backlash over the insipid songs Cetera had as a solo artist, i.e., "The Next Time I Fall."

HRBAKER 11-17-2012 02:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brian Van Horn (Post 1053613)
I can't figure out why Chicago isn't in unless it's backlash over the insipid songs Cetera had as a solo artist, i.e., "The Next Time I Fall."

.....and the post-Kath Chicago catalog of "No Tell Lover" - "If You Leave Me Now" and the such.

barrysloate 11-17-2012 03:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcohen (Post 1053612)
My English teacher in high school in 1966 or so brought the Fugs First Album in to class and played it for us.

Carpe Diem

Lucky your English teacher didn't get into trouble for doing that.:)

drc 11-17-2012 06:49 PM

Of my favorite bands, I think two have a chance to good chance getting in some day: Roxy Music and The Cure. Against my wishes, of course. I'd be surprised if Roxy Music isn't in there some day.

Forget this Rock HOF debate. To me the real crime is that my favorite player was snubbed out of an ESPY :)

WhenItWasAHobby 11-17-2012 10:20 PM

It's hard to to take the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame seriously when one hit wonders like Patti Smith and Dr. John get in and groups like Chicago don't. I guess at the end of the day, who cares? It won't change who I listen to.

HRBAKER 11-17-2012 11:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WhenItWasAHobby (Post 1053712)
It's hard to to take the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame seriously when one hit wonders like Patti Smith and Dr. John get in and groups like Chicago don't. I guess at the end of the day, who cares? It won't change who I listen to.

I think Patti Smith got in for "Best Female Armpit Hair."

drc 11-18-2012 01:10 AM

Patti Smith and Patty Smyth are different rock singers. The latter was the proverbial one hit wonder.

Rickyy 11-18-2012 02:41 AM

Grrrr....Rock N Roll Hall of Fame...why u no select Roxy Music? -_-

Btw...I love Chicago...because old days mentions baseball cards...

Ricky Y

drc 11-18-2012 04:09 AM

I like Dead Kennedys because half their song titles are so blatantly offensive that Leon wouldn't like me list them here.

Actually, Dead Kennedys' first album is an acknowledged punk classic, but it was their gleeful intention to lyrically shock uptight people. Those who were seriously offended (and there were quite a few) missed it that they their songs were satirical and often humorous.

mark evans 11-18-2012 09:51 AM

Music appreciation is pretty subjective stuff. Chicago is not my cup of tea but I presume they belong in the HOF due to a boatload of cd sales over many years.

drc 11-18-2012 12:28 PM

I'm unfamiliar with their music, so offer no opinion.

My all time favorite band is The Psychedelic Furs. I'm confident they won't be in the Hall of Fame.

And, yes, art appreciation is personal and subjective.

perezfan 11-18-2012 12:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by drc (Post 1053720)
I like Dead Kennedys because half their song titles are so blatantly offensive that Leon wouldn't like me list them here.

Actually, Dead Kennedys' first album is an acknowledged punk classic, but it was their gleeful intention to lyrically shock uptight people. Those who were seriously offended (and there were quite a few) missed it that they their songs were satirical and often humorous.

Yeah... lines like "Crushed little kids adorn the Boardwalk" are hard to sell to the masses. Most don't have the capacity to appreciate good satire or anything more complex or different from the mainstream.

I've always viewed the R & R Hall of Fame as a "lowest common denominator", and pay no attention to who they enshrine. If Chicago is out, that probably bodes well for the band's true worth.

The fact that Dion is "in", but bands like Squeeze, Depeche Mode and The Cure are not demonstrates the HOF's lack of diversity and imagination. I guess the Chili Peppers somehow got in, so perhaps there's hope for other innovative/alternative bands. Not that it matters much...

Runscott 11-18-2012 12:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HRBAKER (Post 1053716)
I think Patti Smith got in for "Best Female Armpit Hair."

I thought they got confused and thought she was actually Mick Jagger.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:57 AM.