Net54baseball.com Forums

Net54baseball.com Forums (http://www.net54baseball.com/index.php)
-   Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports (http://www.net54baseball.com/forumdisplay.php?f=31)
-   -   Question For Signed Set Collectors (http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=230635)

MooseDog 11-01-2016 07:16 AM

Question For Signed Set Collectors
 
1 Attachment(s)
I've been working a signed 1990 Leaf set since it came out in 1990. A few of the ones I still need don't pop up often on eBay and I haven't been able to find them elsewhere except at stupid prices (i.e. $79.99 for Keith Hernandez).

My question is, some of these do show up on eBay as 2012 Leaf Memories Buy Backs. From what I understand, the cards were bought on the open market, the gold stamp in the corner was added, and the cards were inserted in packs.

I'm curious if other set collectors consider these Buy Back cards OK to include in a signed set, or would the Buy Back set would be considered a separate set entity. I'm kind of on the fence myself.

Also if anyone is familiar with the 2012 Leaf Memories, some of the signed cards have stamped serial numbers, like the Scott below, and some have handwritten serial numbers. Anyone know the difference?

Thanks for your thoughts.

EldoEsq 11-01-2016 09:59 AM

I consider them good for my sets, thats just me though. I am doing the 1987 Topps set, and I have a bunch of 2004 Topps Originals. They are genuine issue cards, certified and usually MUCH cheaper than sending in cards to a signing!

dgo71 11-01-2016 08:34 PM

It comes down to preference I suppose but I'd consider that a completely different set. That's just my opinion, for me personally I'd consider it cheating so to speak. I have heard of people doing this, or in some cases applying a sticker autograph to an unsigned card (for example, Oscar Taveras' 2014 Heritage Minors is probably close to non-existant given the time between when it was issued and when he passed away) but my preference is to have an actual card from the actual set signed, or not at all. If you don't intend to eventually sell it, go with what you prefer. Keith Hernandez doesn't sign Indians cards, which is why his card in that set is priced so high. I wonder if he or Kelly Gruber signed any of the buybacks. That might be a good way to fill in those toughies.

mrmopar 11-01-2016 08:57 PM

I would count it, as it is an original card from the set. It is modified with the stamp, emboss or whatever else they did to the cards to mark them as buybacks.

As Derek mentioned, sometimes the buybacks are your best shot at a certain card.

HRBAKER 11-01-2016 10:49 PM

Lots of opinions on this.
Once the card is numbered and stamped it becomes part of a different set to me. I wouldn't count it personally.

Do what you think is right, it's a hobby.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:41 PM.