Net54baseball.com Forums

Net54baseball.com Forums (http://www.net54baseball.com/index.php)
-   Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports (http://www.net54baseball.com/forumdisplay.php?f=31)
-   -   Koufax/Drysdale baseball help (http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=236777)

jimjim 03-13-2017 08:14 AM

Koufax/Drysdale baseball help
 
1 Attachment(s)
What are your thoughts on this ball? These are the best pictures I have right now. I am leaning towards authentic. Thanks!

jimjim 03-13-2017 08:15 AM

1 Attachment(s)
Pic 2

Scott Garner 03-13-2017 11:56 AM

I may be wrong, but I personally would not feel comfortable with that Koufax signature.

jimjim 03-13-2017 01:36 PM

Scott is correct. I just realized it has a fake scoreboard COA. Sorry for wasting the boards time.

Fuddjcal 03-13-2017 05:18 PM

I think they both are good.

granite75 03-13-2017 05:34 PM

I've had Scoreboard stuff come back as legit

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

Kco 03-13-2017 06:24 PM

I'm not sure if they are bad I wish you had better pictures...

jimjim 03-13-2017 06:40 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Here is a copy of the COA. The COA is clearly fake, as their name is not spelled correctly. I wish I had better pictures, but this is all that was given to me. The Drysdale looks OK, but the Koufax I am not sure about.

Fuddjcal 03-14-2017 10:32 AM

look, these are clearly authentic. The fake koufax/drysdales floating around are PATHETIC and easily identifiable. From what you can see, there is every indication they are real and ZERO indication they are not. Unless I see more, I stand by my assumptions.

rlevy 03-14-2017 11:41 AM

1 Attachment(s)
The ball would have had to have been signed by Drysdale before his death in July 1993. If he had signed the baseball before Koufax, it is likely that he would have signed on the sweetspot, so in all likelihood Koufax would have already signed the ball by then. Below is a sample of Sandy's signature from 1993 for comparison (Koufax's signature has changed dramatically over the years). To my eye, the slant on the "Koufax" is all wrong on the baseball you are evaluating.

Rick
Attachment 265832

Scott Garner 03-14-2017 12:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rlevy (Post 1641068)
The ball would have had to have been signed by Drysdale before his death in July 1993. If he had signed the baseball before Koufax, it is likely that he would have signed on the sweetspot, so in all likelihood Koufax would have already signed the ball by then. Below is a sample of Sandy's signature from 1993 for comparison (Koufax's signature has changed dramatically over the years). To my eye, the slant on the "Koufax" is all wrong on the baseball you are evaluating.

Rick
Attachment 265832

Exactly. ;)
Thanks Ron

Fuddjcal 03-14-2017 08:44 PM

after review, the Drysdale is absolutely authentic on this ball and the koufax from what I cay see is also authentic. Strictly my opinion. I have collected both for years.

There is not one thing wrong with the Drysdale. If so fatso...lets hear it? We don't know when it was signed? I am familiar with the date of Drysdale's death as my Dodger seats were the row behind his at time. And the koufax is probably good from what I can see. It's certainly not a Shop at Home fake.

Scott Garner 03-15-2017 04:18 AM

I never commented on the Drysdale sig in my initial post, but I do agree it does appear to be real. I have less experience with "Big D", but did get his autograph a couple of times during the 1970's when he was part of the Angels broadcast team.

djson1 03-17-2017 02:49 PM

Isn't it Paul "Goldin"??

(oh, I see that's been pointed out already). :)


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:50 PM.