'52 bowman yankees
 

Posted By: <b>Roger</b><p><br><br>This is the last of a series.<br><br>What team compositions would you like to see next?<br><br><img src="http://i425.photobucket.com/albums/pp335/rnisly/yankcomp.jpg" alt="[linked image]">

'52 bowman yankees
 

Posted By: <b>Dave Hornish</b><p>I can't choose between Bauer and Silvera-both are great. Many nice paintings in the Yankees team set.

'52 bowman yankees
 

Posted By: <b>David McDonald</b><p>They are all beautiful!! Takes me back to small kid time, baggy pinstripes and pre-70's renovation Yankee Stadium. Saw a lot of these guys play and value the memories. Mantle, Berra, Jensen (with BoSox), Woodling (with Cleveland). Used to sit in Bauer's hip pocket in right field stands. Lovin' it. Gotta pick a card? How about Collins stretching off of first? A quintessential pose.<br><br>I like the '50 Bowmans and '53 Topps a lot but there seems to be a preponderance of headshots in those sets. How about '55 or '56 Topps for the next go-round? I am partial to the '55s for the color and inclusion of the team logos but I like the real photo action shots on the '56's, too.<br><br>Keep up the great work, Roger.<br><br><img src="http://www.network54.com/Realm/June08/55T_Skowron.jpg" alt="[linked image]"> <img src="http://www.network54.com/Realm/June08/56T_Skowron.jpg" alt="[linked image]">

'52 bowman yankees
 

Posted By: <b>Paul Carek</b><p>Roger,<br><br>I've really enjoyed your '52 Bowman team posts, as I'm (slowly) putting together that set myself. Thanks for the effort.<br><br>As far as what I'd like to see next, how about Opening Day lineups from '55 or '56?

'52 bowman yankees
 

Posted By: <b>dennis</b><p>1959 topps reasons.... big set so lots of players represented &amp; <br>it has the team logos on the cards!

'52 bowman yankees
 

Posted By: <b>Chris Counts</b><p>Roger,<br><br>I prefer to look at cards when they're organized by team. Years ago, I was struck by how well the 1952 Bowmans display, particularly when the cards are organized by team. One reason the look so good, I believe, is that the images are so consistent. It's not like most sets, here you have a mix of head shots and far-away action poses. in the '52 set, they're all mid-range shots (just about every single image, no less!). The '50, '51 and '53 Bowman sets are all favorites of mine (all of which had truly great artwork or photography), but none, in my opinion, display quite as well as the '52s ...<br><br>Chris