Is this photo original??
 

Posted By: <b>dan mckee</b><p><a href="http://cgi.ebay.com/1916-BF2-Baseball-Pennant-Buck-Weaver_W0QQitemZ250416072700QQihZ015QQcategoryZ868 41QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem" target="_new" rel="nofollow">http://cgi.ebay.com/1916-BF2-Baseball-Pennant-Buck-Weaver_W0QQitemZ250416072700QQihZ015QQcategoryZ868 41QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem</a>

Is this photo original??
 

Posted By: <b>Greg Ecklund</b><p>Same photo that is on every BF2<br><br><img src="http://i110.photobucket.com/albums/n82/Gecklund311/BuckWeaver.jpg" alt="[linked image]">

Is this photo original??
 

Posted By: <b>Steve Murray</b><p><img src="http://i52.photobucket.com/albums/g5/jacklitsch1/Black%20Sox/WeaverM101-5.jpg" alt="[linked image]">

Is this photo original??
 

Posted By: <b>D. Bergin</b><p>I think the question is: Do BF2's use Real Photo types or Printed Photo Types?<br><br><br>

Is this photo original??
 

Posted By: <b>dan mckee</b><p>Yes that was what I was trying to ask. My Walter Johnson that was removed from a sewn togehter blanket doesn't have this dot pattern. Dan.

Is this photo original??
 

Posted By: <b>D. Bergin</b><p>What if you look at it under a loupe. Some scanners really exaggerate the dot pattern on printed photos and make them look worse then they are.<br><br>

Is this photo original??
 

Posted By: <b>dan mckee</b><p>Yes I will try that tonight, hopefully you are correct. I just remember a bunch of these recently being sold on ebay w/o the pictures attached. Dan.

Is this photo original??
 

Posted By: <b>Greg Ecklund</b><p>Sorry Dan...misread your question.<br><br>I have close to a set of these and just looked through about half, including Johnson - they all have the dot pattern and are printed.<br><br>Can you post a scan of yours?

Is this photo original??
 

Posted By: <b>Randall Adams</b><p>Those are my BF2's, here is a better scan of the Weaver. <br><br><img src="http://cincitec.com/images/ebay/bf3/buck.jpg" border="5" alt="pitt.jpg">