Autograph opinions please. THANKS.
 

Just picked up a Luke Easter signed photocard , which is in light ballpoint (hope you can see) and a nice Billy Martin signed 1953 postcard. What do you guys think ? I think Billy is good, there are a couple differences, but it IS VINTAGE and such too, looks mainly good. Easter is light, but I know he's a semi desirable sig. Im hoping to sell them on NET54 soon, but would like you guys opinions first. THANKS. scott

Enlarged scans.

I can't speak for or against the Easter, but the Martin is good.

Thanks David on the Billy. I had few doubts there.

I wish Luke was darker, but for what I paid, I can't complain.

Here is my Easter photo, see what you think.

Ken
earlywynnfan5@hotmail.com

they look the same basically, but mine is light. darn. I shall look tonight when I have it in hand. ;)