|
[QUOTE=Sean1125;1030763]Hey guys, just had a local guy sell me his collection. There was quite a few autos in there. I got it cheap enough that the cards cover anything these autos wouldn't bring if authentic.
Anywhere here are the autos: I did not think the Koufax was good, the S looked off and normally his sig seems to bed one with more finesse, but maybe someone can tell otherwise. Hi Sean, I can help with a few: The Ryan Topps card is not real The Ryan ball is real although fading The Ryan postcard is autopen You are correct that the Koufax ball is bad, IMHO I hope this helps |
Quote:
Kell, Tiant, Chapman = Good. |
Sewell looks good, Ripken looks off-never seen him sign the "r" in Jr. and I have not seen an "R" in Ripken connect to the I. However, I am not an expert.
|
I'm hoping the Ripken is an early sig, I know how much they can vary.
I didn't check it before I got the lot, but I don't see how any person with half a brain would try to forge a Ripken Jr on a decently expensive card. If a Ripken expert can chime in that would be great. Here is a PSA/DNA similar one pulled from an e-bay auction - but of course they cut the picture off at the J.....: http://i828.photobucket.com/albums/z...-11/img886.jpg Sean |
Quote:
|
Yeah in looking at that Cal, it just didn't look right, haven't seen that style of his sig before...hopefully it's an early rookie signature
|
Ripken
The ripken card is NG, at least nothing I have seen working with him since 1991.
did PSA cert that ball? or did seller put it in a psa ball holder |
Quote:
|
Ripken is no good.
|
ok good
would hate to think PSA certed that ball |
Quote:
Search "ripken jr early" Sold for $105 July 25 http://www.ebay.com/itm/ws/eBayISAPI...vip=true&rt=nc |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:15 PM. |