Which of these should I send into PSA for my free gradings?
So I posted a few days ago to see whether or not people thought I should send these Cards to PSA. (Just asked about the first few scans)
Now I need to know which cards Should be sent for my 15 free ones. All of them will be graded (unless noted otherwise), But the 15 Free ones will get returned to me much faster, Thus allowing me to get to work selling them sooner for my friend. Im still unsure on the Williams, Whether to send it or not. Which 15 would you send in first? I have an Idea as too which ones Im thinking they should be but just looking for a few more opinions http://i1121.photobucket.com/albums/...psa2415fb3.jpg http://i1121.photobucket.com/albums/...ps43740f87.jpghttp://i1121.photobucket.com/albums/...ps47aad233.jpg except Eckersley^ http://i1121.photobucket.com/albums/...ps023a5ff7.jpg http://i1121.photobucket.com/albums/...ps86223f2d.jpg Debating the Ted Williams above because its got a crease in the bottom right corner, would you send it? also unsure of the Brett Mini as it too has quite a bit of chipping http://i1121.photobucket.com/albums/...pse7232b64.jpg Green Berra has a ding along the left side http://i1121.photobucket.com/albums/...ps92f5ab28.jpg http://i1121.photobucket.com/albums/...ps8e11af50.jpg The Clemente is scuffed up a bit http://i1121.photobucket.com/albums/...psadd3fdc9.jpg |
Don't enjoy stating the completely obvious, but here I go. That 1962 Clemente is significantly shorter than the '68 Mantle beside it. Looks like someone took a razor to its top and/or bottom.
|
Quote:
|
The 59 sandy K would get a o/c so I would skip that
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I'd slab the Mantle (harder to move in their natural state, particularly when that clean) as the Spahn (at the bottom). For the others, I would pick the ones that have the best centering. These cards are beautiful but there are some centering issues. You are less likely to get the bump from the registry guys for cards with qualifiers.
|
Quote:
|
Me, I'm a little more agressive at sending cards in
I would use a 15 percent rule --- meaning if the grading is 15percent (or so) the total value of the card in that condition, I'd send that in for grading. For example -- if the card is worth $50 in that shape, I'd send that in for grading at an $8 level and I'd widen the net a bit as well
I wouild send in the following cards if no creases and measure OK and actually a couple of additions 68 Mantle -- I'd send that in any condition 62 Clemente 55 Robinson -- I'd send that in any condition 76 Payton RC 68 Bench 52 Spahn 56 Koufax 56 Ted Williams And anything else you are comfortable in for sending in for grading. With these cards, the more you get graded, the easier sales they will be for all concerned. Rich |
I hope I am wrong here. I think PSA sets limitations on the free grades with membership purchase. The value of the given card may not exceed a certain dollar level. I did not look too closely at your cards, so if they're EX-MT or NM, you may send them away. Not in any way meant to be a killjoy, but do check their rules closely.
Here's wishing you a pleasant outcome! Salute. ---Brian Powell |
If it were me, I'd send the 68 Mantle. That card is a 7 or better in my opinion.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Pretty sure for free subs there is no min value, the best way to send the stars in IMO |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:11 AM. |