Net54baseball.com Forums

Net54baseball.com Forums (http://www.net54baseball.com/index.php)
-   Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions (http://www.net54baseball.com/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Anyone Else Know this Answer? (http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=235875)

ezez420 02-24-2017 09:08 AM

Anyone Else Know this Answer?
 
1 Attachment(s)
I think we all know the answer...nothing to do with the Federal Reserve. What a crock.

jcc6252 02-24-2017 09:37 AM

BTW, how is that a 10 (rough cut edges, centering to the left)?

Stampsfan 02-24-2017 12:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jcc6252 (Post 1634830)
BTW, how is that a 10 (rough cut edges, centering to the left)?

NK. The Oilers logo is off too. It's a joke. Almost like it slipped through the cracks. I've seen way better 8's in that card than that thing.

EvilKing00 02-25-2017 06:20 AM

I have a bccg 8 and its much nicer:D

irv 02-25-2017 06:43 AM

Imo, that is the Wagner of the hockey world.

Although it was graded eons ago, I also believe, like the Wagner, it was given a 10 to further enhance PSA's status in the hobby.

Hard to believe that sold for almost a 1/2 million dollars recently, especially since, like what has been mentioned, many copies are out there that surpass this one easily.

philliesphan 02-25-2017 11:21 AM

At least it's not sheet cut-

glynparson 02-25-2017 11:24 AM

I agree on centering
 
but for like the 1000th time, like it or not a rough cut is not considered a flaw. You can scream about it all you want the grading companies do not see it that way, and for the record neither do i. a rough cut is actually often considered a plus as proof it was not trimmed or sheet cut.

Peter_Spaeth 02-25-2017 11:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by glynparson (Post 1635226)
but for like the 1000th time, like it or not a rough cut is not considered a flaw. You can scream about it all you want the grading companies do not see it that way, and for the record neither do i. a rough cut is actually often considered a plus as proof it was not trimmed or sheet cut.

I only object when the cut extends into the corners and they are not square, at that point I think it's an appropriate deduction. A 9 with a 30 degree angled corner just seems wrong.

PhillipAbbott79 02-25-2017 11:36 AM

Is there a link you can give?

Leon 03-03-2017 06:23 AM

Agreed. I like the rough cut on some cards too. They look original... Some W501s come to mind...

Quote:

Originally Posted by glynparson (Post 1635226)
but for like the 1000th time, like it or not a rough cut is not considered a flaw. You can scream about it all you want the grading companies do not see it that way, and for the record neither do i. a rough cut is actually often considered a plus as proof it was not trimmed or sheet cut.


slidekellyslide 03-03-2017 07:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by glynparson (Post 1635226)
but for like the 1000th time, like it or not a rough cut is not considered a flaw. You can scream about it all you want the grading companies do not see it that way, and for the record neither do i. a rough cut is actually often considered a plus as proof it was not trimmed or sheet cut.

I completely disagree. It's a factory flaw, I doubt they intended for their cut to leave jagged edges just like they didn't want off center cards, and they didn't want printing flaws. It's a flaw, a very common flaw, but still a flaw. No card with a rough cut should ever get a 10. 10's should be reserved for perfect cards.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:00 AM.