T206 harder commons list please ?
Just started trying to put together T206 set going to start with 'commons ... is there a list for more difficult commons?
Are portraits always more money ? If a player has a portrait only and another has an action card only which player is perceived to have been a better ballplayer? Any tidbits will help .. bored of collecting 40s 50s 60s so here goes T206 I guess Cheers Bryan |
Quote:
http://www.t206insider.com/store/c1/...=field_30|desc Scott's "Inside T206" is an invaluable resource if you're just getting into the set, as is T206resource.com. http://t206resource.com/Images/Publi...al-edition.pdf http://t206resource.com/index.html |
Hi Bryan - Leaving things like the SP rarities of Doyle/Magie/St. Louis Demmitt/O'Hara out, the Elberfeld WAS Port./Dahlen Brooklyn are at the top. Dahlen's more like a star but I'm talking non-HOFs here.
The six horizontals are all more than standard commons, with Pelty being the priciest. Durham, Titus, Tenney, Frank Smith CHI/BOS, Ames Hands at Chest, Adkins, Rhoades Arm Extended, and Puttman are well-known more expensive/tougher ones. Donlin Seated is often cited but PSA has actually graded significantly fewer of his fielding card. And of course all of the Southern Leaguers are mostly lightly-regarded players but not sold as commons. There's a slew of probably a couple dozen others that could be cited as a little tougher than normal. That list above isn't comprehensive and I could even be leaving a bigger one out. Here are some older threads: http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=219324 http://www.net54baseball.com/showthr...=156223&page=3 |
Good stuff and thank you ...i checked out the linx much appreciated
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:45 AM. |