View Single Post
  #18  
Old 06-14-2012, 11:39 AM
doug.goodman doug.goodman is offline
Doug Goodman
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: On the road again...
Posts: 4,697
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mintacular View Post
I can see avoiding some variations and considering your set done but let's not go too far with that concept i.e. saying that you have a 1952 Topps Set complete without the high #'s--now that's going overboard (pun intended)
I don't consider it a "complete set", I consider it a "complete low number set"

Doug
Reply With Quote