??
Don't understand your 1916 v. 195_ argument.....
Rickey born 12-20-1881, died 12-09-1965, so 195_ would be a viable date he COULD have signed something. Your Rickey sig looks a little different than others I've seen but I'm not entirely sure about it's authenticity. Maybe someone else could weigh in on it.
Plus I'd assume that, while Ron's book is a great illustrator of autographs, it's not inconceivable that something could be authentic while not looking EXACTLY like an auto in his book......it's a 'GUIDE' after all.
Don't throw away the Rickey just yet........anyone?
|