Quote:
Originally Posted by thenavarro
Props to PSA for not certifying an autograph where they felt they didn't have reliable exemplars. Thumbs up!
|
But Mr. Navarro, they did have an exemplar of Julian's handwriting, the bob fitzsimmons autograph signed by Julian that they certified as a real Fitzsimmons autograph. So they had an exemplar all along!
If they are citing lack of exemplars, why couldn't they do that with the Tom Sayers that they got caught certing?
Please answer.
Why did they pass on certifying a Joe Choynski autograph on two separate ocassions last year for the same auction house, again citing a lack of exemplars, when they had previously certed a Joe Choynski that went to another auction at an earlier date? They must have HAD Choynski exemplars, but then lost them? I don't get it? Did the Choynski exemplars burn up they no longer had them?
http://sports.ha.com/c/item.zx?saleNo=7065&lotNo=82803
http://sports.ha.com/c/item.zx?saleNo=7065&lotNo=81202
but then oops, here is a choynski they previously certed. with the same no exemplars, I must assume?
http://catalog.scpauctions.com/lot-8717.aspx
Am I the only one seeing a pattern here?
What is this revising history pretending they didn't previously cert autograph they now claim they don't have exemplars for?
They had already certed a Martin Julian, it just happened to be PSA claiming a Bob Fitzsimmons autograph that Julian ghost signed for Bob.