It's a type 3 because it's a composite.
Type 3s are defined as not printed from the original negative, but printed within the same approximate 2yr window as a type 1.
Composites have multiple separate photos shot together to create a new negative which is used to print from.
IMHO, this is a weakness in the type system. To me, each of these are an original creation by either the photographer or editor to be used at that time. I think these should be considered type 1s.
BTW... Great pick-up Ben!
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Last edited by Lordstan; 08-27-2013 at 08:09 AM.
|