Michael, if I had to give a definitive answer, no hedging, I would say 'good'.
I'm no Ruth expert, but I also have avoided giving definitive thoughts on Ruth autographs, so there goes nothing.
It would also not surprise me if you showed a photo of the entire ball, and it had a stamp with Selig's name. There are a lot of good Ruth forgers out there, which is why I don't trust any Ruth autographs without 'provenance'.
__________________
$co++ Forre$+
|