[HerbK]

Leon,

My apologies - I will, in the future sign my name when posting against something or someone.

My post wasn't inferring that these sorts of cards were not collectible – particularly if you’re unconcerned with the grade. Hey, different strokes for different folks. What I was stating (sarcastically) which I stand by, was that the card in question, did not deserve the grade of “EX 5”. I see three or four significant issues with this card (registration – perhaps the worst I’ve ever seen, the border itself – one third of it is present while the balance is missing as it is clearly miscut). And we haven’t even seen the back – although one would think that if it does look OK that the seller would have been better served to include a scan of it. Heck, I might even be tempted to make it the main listing photo lol.

From PSA’s site:

EX 5: Excellent
On PSA EX-5 cards, very minor rounding of the corners is becoming evident. Surface wear or printing defects are more visible. There may be minor chipping on edges. Loss of original gloss will be more apparent. Focus of picture may be slightly out-of-register. Several light scratches may be visible upon close inspection, but do not detract from the appeal of the card. Card may show some off-whiteness of borders. Centering must be 85/15 or better on the front and 90/10 or better on the back.

The card does not look “slightly” out of register...

PSA 5’s for 1915 no name players are fetching $200 – $200+. Though some may feel that such a card is worth a premium, I’m not one of them. But to list the card for 100% more than what a 5 should go for, is in my opinion, ridiculous.

BTW... I made this post with no particular intent to slam PSA. My collection is comprised of PSA and SGC and like/dislike each company for different reasons. They both have their goods and bads...

Herb Kane.