Quote:
Originally Posted by t206hound
Curious as to the answer to my questions...
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by t206hound
Still waiting...
Are you are saying that within a series (Piedmont 350 in this instance) that the layouts did or did not change?
If you believe they did not change, then it's been demonstrated that there are other cards adjacent to those that you say appeared together and therefore your assertion is incorrect.
If you believe that they did change, then how can you assert beyond a reasonable doubt that they ever appeared together on a single sheet?
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by t206hound
Well, my beer is gone. I waited all weekend and no discussion.
|
Man, you are one hyper dude !
FYI....we were away in Cape May since Friday for some Sun, Surf & Fun.
Anyhow, there is really nothing more that I can add that will convince you that your "17" (or 34) myth is not the way ALC printed these cards.
I have tried to explain the basis for the 48-subject arrangement that I posted.....but, it's either not registering, or you just do not understand
where I'm coming from.
TED Z
.