View Single Post
  #114  
Old 01-04-2016, 09:08 AM
packs packs is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 8,850
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jiw98 View Post
I have a question for the HOF voters. If a player isn't worthy of getting in their first year of eligibility, how are they worthy a year or more later? The way I look at it is you are either good enough to be in the Hall or your not. After retirement players stats don't get better with age.


I don't agree with that. Sometimes a player's career takes on a different context as time goes on. Goose Gossage is a good example of that. Today closers pitch one inning. Over time people saw the contribution of Gossage as having a greater significance given the nature of the position today. That's likely why he's in.

Other times there's a high level of competition for votes. So even though a player has a HOF career, he may enter the voting at a bad time where people are forced to vote for one person over another. That could delay election like it did for Biggio.

Last edited by packs; 01-04-2016 at 09:09 AM.
Reply With Quote