Something about this looks very off to me. They all appear to be the same (thickness, pressure, etc). It almost looks like someone assembled facsimile autos onto a page and printed it. I also question the header. That would appear to be printed on there. Not sure when printers became commonplace, but 1964 seems a bit early for that. Are you saying that these are supposed to be real signatures or simply a display of printed facsimile signatures
Quote:
Originally Posted by Case12
I am not expert on his autograph, but recently picked this up. Maybe it will help.
|