Quote:
Originally Posted by perezfan
Saw this comment posted in another tread, and thought is was appropriate to add it to Corey's thoughts...
Having Beckett re-review the card is like consulting the doctor who committed malpractice for a second opinion. Common sense alone dictates that you take the card to someone else.
Talk about a conflict of interest. This is criminal.
|
its just a battle of the experts. I think if they said 'yeah 40 of the cards we missed by mistake but we are right about this 1 card' that would be a tough road. Who knows what the argument will ultimately be. I wonder if Beckett confirmed any past trimming or are they just used for their positive opinions.
But yeah i assume some 'trims' may not be easy to prove were trimmed.