The post arguing against the "invalidity" of artificially rare cards is correct. Rare is rare and a number is a number.
However, rarity should be looked more broad based and not myopocially. 1000 different one-of-ones is not the same as three one-of-100.
And sales prices is just sales price, and indicates only sales price. Quality cannot be quantified.
Also, the sales price at a particular moment is indicitive of the sales price at that particular moment. McGuire's 70th home run ball once sold for over $3million and a Tiger Woods SI rookie once for $100,000. Those "values" are nothing more that historical curiosities (and sometimes jokes) now.
Hobby fixation on financial financial value doesn't interest me.
Last edited by drcy; 08-23-2020 at 11:53 AM.
|