View Single Post
  #52  
Old 03-08-2021, 08:45 AM
scmavl's Avatar
scmavl scmavl is offline
J@RR0D
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: NC
Posts: 2,139
Default

I'd say '50 Bowman. I just didn't like the smaller size as compared to '51 Bowman. But after getting a few in hand, and seeing all of the great rookie/early cards of historic players, I'm a fan. And I'd say '49 Bowman as well, but to a lesser degree.

Reply With Quote