View Single Post
  #45  
Old 06-30-2021, 04:20 PM
jiw98 jiw98 is offline
Jeff H
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Looking for par MI to FL
Posts: 446
Default

I'm for letting both Jackson and Rose in the HOF. Joe Jackson could not have broken a rule that didn't exist until years later. (Rule 21 adopted 1927) Even after being found not guilty by the jury on Aug 2, 1921, it wasn't until the following day that Landis said that any player betting on baseball will be banned.
As for Rose I'm for letting him in for what he did as a player. I do believe he should be banned from baseball for betting as a manager.
JMHO
Reply With Quote