View Single Post
  #16  
Old 01-16-2024, 08:20 AM
BillyCoxDodgers3B BillyCoxDodgers3B is online now
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,719
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Seven View Post
It's a terrible look. The move away from what I would presume are Fountain Pens, to sharpies was awful.
An important part of the transitionary evolution, and the one that made permanent markers the implement of choice for cards: the ballpoint pen. For cards, they were far too temperamental, especially in an in-person, ballpark situation. Too many light signatures signed in too many dark areas. Many IP signatures were signed so poorly that they look more like indentations on the cardboard rather than autographs.

We also had the (thankfully) short-lived period of the flair pen, which ran concurrent with 1960's ballpoint all the way into the 1970's era when Sharpies started cornering a nice portion of the process.

Love them or hate them, Sharpies definitely earned their place. I agree with you that a period fountain pen signature is king, but they too could be temperamental. So many variables. Sharpies and the like are the most consistent for cards, so their staying power is quite understandable.
Reply With Quote