[Archive]

Posted By: jay behrens

So how is it the opinions of 3 people that read everything Planich had to say here and saw and heard SCDA's side of the story is any different than a court case and less meaningful than that of jury? And please spare me the rules of evidence and legaistic junk. We went in thinking the bat had major problems because of what Planich had stated. They basically had to convince us that this bat was what they claimed it to be. In a trial, the jury isn't supposed to have any preconcieved notions, so SCDA's job would be that much easier. With us, they had to change our mind.

The 3 people that have more knowledge about this situation than almost anyone else walked away from it with basically the same opinions. So this is the closest you are going to get to a trial and can't realistically expect much more than that.

Jay

I've just reached Upper Lower Class. I am now officially a babe magnet for poor chicks.