[Archive]

Posted By: identify7

I can not argue those points, Leon. Certainly the motivation of the card owner would not be the rental money. Nor would either party want to risk a friend loosing equity in his home, or other asset. And it is certainly true that in many instances the card involved may not be replacable, at any price.

This may not be feasible. Or at least may not be feasible for some cards (I have a '54 Topps Snider for rent - in condition that noone is likely to devalue). Thank you for exploring the thought, Leon, Julie, Anson and others who considered it.

Please feel free everyone to continue to play with the idea, and contribute your thoughts, if applicable.