View Single Post
  #7  
Old 02-09-2007, 07:41 AM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default My T206 Plank theory....New Follow-up info

Posted By: Ted Zanidakis

Compensation (or lack of it) for these BB players to be portrayed in BB card sets, in my opinion, is
a negligible factor....as it really did not amount to much. So, I cannot see this applying to Plank's
T206 card situation.

Now, Sam Leever is in the E90-1 set, so I am not sure what you are asking about him ? However,
he should have been in the T206 set.

"Babe" Adams is not in the E90-1 set because his career did not get started until 1909....the E90-1
set was already out in the market by then. Adams was really great in the 1909 World Series, as he
won 3 games with a 1.33 ERA.

I have to run now, and I'll get to your 2nd post later.

TED Z

Reply With Quote