Posted By:
RichardGuys, I agree that it is absurd to consider the 1933 Goudey Ruth to be the rookie card. What gives Beckett the authority to make that decision? It simply dosen't make sense. Common sense tells you that something that sounds irrational usually is. This is sheer nonsense. If Beckett considers the 1933 Goudey his rookie then I say that his 1916 M101-5 is his minor league rookie card. Makes about as much sense. Give me a break and wake up Beckett.