[Archive]

Posted By: Dylan

Im only 25 pages into the book but the story is an intersting read so far. We'd all have liked to see the infallible piece of evidence produced. The picture thats supposed to exist of the card in its untouched state would be extraordinary. But those of you that say its missing the smoking gun also probably think with 100% certaintly the card is hand cut. Do we need to have before photos to know that, really? I hear that the writer made some errors that had to do with trivial knowledge of baseball sets(which is unfortunate as id imagine many here wouldve proof read the dang thing), but that doesnt need reflect on the main issue of the story.