[Archive]

Posted By: Scott Sarian

I agree with JimB's point that there seems to be something wrong if people are paying more for "strong" cards with great "eye appeal" but have a low technical grade. Take for instance the pictured E121 Walter Johnson which I own. It received a PSA 1 (and since crossed to an SGC 20) due to a couple of very minor paper loss spots on the back. I would MUCH rather have this card, than a card with the same grade and no paper loss but with creases, rounded corners, etc.