View Single Post
  #10  
Old 11-09-2008, 09:52 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default Joe Jackson WG6 Opinions

Posted By: James Gallo

Matt,


No agenda here though I have gotten and seen more PSA mistakes then SGC. The example I refer to was mid to high grade and in a legit PSA slab. It was offered on the BST and someone pointed out to the seller it was not real. I believe it was resolved with PSA in some manner.

My comment was more geared toward the fact that this is a mistake that PSA IMO is more likely and has made, rather then a beat up example in a SGC holder that is shown without a back scan.

It seems that the extra roundness to the corners is a result of age and not anything else. I think a either a scan of the back or a larger front scan would make this obvious.

I do not doubt that the PSA example shown is real, I just found it funny the way you worded it.

If this was a regular issue you would have just seem the rounded corners as what they are wear to the card.

Considering what the card is at and how "common" it is in high grade, I would expect it to sell for more then it should as it will be the cheapest playing era jackson card around.

Anyway, not picking on you, just felt the way it was worded was a bit funny.

James G

Looking for 1915 Cracker Jacks and 1909-11 American Caramel E90-1.

Reply With Quote