Posted By:
leonAl- that is a great card. From the scan it definiitely deserves an 88. Wowser!!
I think a 30 is warranted too but the card is in my collection so it's not a big deal. I was just mentioning it in the context of this thread and some other things going on.
Steve- I understand it's not the printing of the name that is in question pertaining to the registration being spoken about. I only mentioned it because the lettering, in real life, has perfect registration. In the scan it doesn't...so that is the degree of error, that needs to be taken into account, on the entire card. It's that much better in real life.
I do see the ink going across the border. My experience is they don't take off a lot for that on ex and below cards, depending on severity.....(re: many E90-1 Young- Boston's with hash marks on the front bottom and other off registration series of cards)