Quote:
Originally Posted by Leon
Did Burdick get the classifications correctly?
|
Leon - I answered that question several times during the discussion including Post #40 and #121 in which I said:
"Rob - I think Burdick as several others have said grouped the Type 1's separate from the T206 because the Type 2 and 3 cards existed. If there were no Type 2 or 3 then Type 1's would be part of the T206 set. So in my opinion he got the designation correct but for the wrong reason."
I don't believe he ever thought as deeply about whether to include them or not as some of us have.
I'm certainly not trying to get the discussion off topic and I have probably said enough about the matter. Again great topic and I'll step aside and let others continue the conversation from here.