Quote:
Originally Posted by t206hound
Technically you "ordered" the card; once it was determined that it was no longer "in stock" your funds were returned and your "order" was cancelled.
purchase: Acquire (something) by paying for it;
order: Request (something) to be made, supplied, or served
|
Umm, no, technically he purchased the cards. They sent an invoice and according to his statment he paid within 1 minute. When he sent payment, that is a purchase whether they are in his possession or not. If you go down to a furniture store and buy a new dining room set and they give you a back order slip telling you it will be there in 2-3 weeks, have you still not purchased the furniture whether you have taken delivery of it or not? How you could defend behavior like this is unbelievable.
And another thing, when Nate paid for the cards they were "in stock." He paid from the invoice they sent him. However, instead of removing them from stock to fill Nate's "order," the seller decided to sell them to the second buyer for more money. A deal is a deal, and to back out of the deal for a better offer shows the content of their character. I don't see how anybody can defend DACW's actions.