[Archive]

Posted By: runscott

so it's impossible for him to tell if Rose made any managerial decisions because of betting. But if you want to argue this point, unless Rose can be considered to have performed as a manager better than any manager in history, it is always possible that his "sub-perfection" performance was due in part to implementing decisions influenced by the bets he had placed. And yes, some of those decisions may have resulted in player injuries (possibly very minor) that would not otherwise have ocurred.