Quote:
Originally Posted by Yanks23
Not trying to stir the pot, but “fraud”? Misleading (intentionally or not), sure. But if a seller clearly lists in the description that the card(s) is being sold as a reprint, how is that a problem?
|
I have no problem with someone who lists these cards and writes in these title that it is a reproduction - example Reproduction of a T206 Ty Cobb. When they list in the title that it is a 1909 T206 Ty Cobb and bury the word reproduction in the description - as well as put a few bends in it to make it look old - their intent is to trick someone into thinking it is real and it is outright fraud because it is not from 1909. In most cases they know it is a reprint and come up with some plausible story about how it could be real.