View Single Post
  #19  
Old 02-10-2007, 01:25 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default My T206 Plank theory....New Follow-up info

Posted By: John

Frank,

While your post drips of sarcasm, it also shows your ability or lack there of to manage basic math.

1903 Breisch Williams Type I E107
1906 Fan Craze American League WG2
1908 American Caramel Co. E91 Set A
1909 Philadelphia Caramel E95
1909 Ramley T204
1909-10 W555 W555
1909-11 American Caramel Co. E90-1
1909-11 White Borders T206
1910 American Caramel Co. Die-Cuts E125
1910 Nadja Philadelphia Athletics E104-I
1910 Orange Borders
1910 Standard Caramel Co. E93
1910-11 Sporting Life M116
1911 Cullivan's Fireside Philadelphia A's T208
1911 Pinkerton T5 503
1911 Rochester Baking Philadelphia A's D359
1913 Fatima Team Cards T200 Philadelphia American
1913 Fatima Team Premiums Philadelphia American
1914 Cracker Jack E145-I 6
1914 General Baking Co. D303
1914 People's Tobacco (Kotton, Mino, Virginia Extra) T216
1914 Polo Grounds Game WG4
1914 Texas Tommy Type I E224
1915 American Caramel Co. E106
1915 Cracker Jack E145-II 6

Even if I remove the items with Plank you so easily singled out, that still leaves about 25 sets that would include Plank on a card. Or would you care to eliminate any others to help make your point??

As for the E104’s I don’t think he was stretching I seem to believe the set that includes this Plank card in debate, has a O’Hara, Demmitt, Elberfeld & Magie among others which are counted as different cards for their variations, or are they the same and shouldn’t be counted twice?????

I posted the info only as reference not sure why you find the need to be so nasty? Its amazing most people who try and prove theory’s (archeologists, doctors, scholars etc.) generally work with and debate the current academic communities to prove their point. Not just imply that anyone who disagrees are simply idiots, therefore the new theory is correct.

While the theory is neat and the research interesting, myself I’m having a hard time putting to much stock in detailed deep research from a guy who cant even use a standard catalog of cards to find what sets Plank is included on. Was that sarcastic and rude??? Just following a pattern set by yours truly….

Reply With Quote