[Archive]

Posted By: Hal Lewis

Couldn't this just be REA's way of acknowledging receipt of the e-mail that was apparently circulated a week ago about Charlie's auction?

I know that Charlie explained his situation and defended himself well...

but isn't it possible that the same consignor who might have sent doctored cards into Charlie's auction also sent them into REA?

I think Charlie is 100% innocent, just like REA...

but I am sure that whoever circulated that e-mail sent a copy to REA, which would almost FORCE them to respond.