Quote:
Originally Posted by savedfrommyspokes
Nice pickups Ben....I like the Clemens variation. It seems that this variation has been known for a while, so it is surprising that PSA does not recognize is as variation (like the 61 Fairly print defect) as it is both recurring and limited.
|
I like the Clemens error also. Many years ago it used to be listed as an error. Then one of the times Bob Lemke was removing print errors for SCD it got yanked. I don't think PSA has ever recognized it as an error version.
The Ripken cards show it is easy to get counterfeit cards graded by PSA. The opinion on the Bill Ripken website saying they are counterfeit is mine. It is poorly written but 100% correct. It was not intended to be put on a website it was a email to the site owner explaining how/why it is fake.