Thread: 1952 Bowman
View Single Post
  #13  
Old 02-05-2018, 08:21 PM
pingman59's Avatar
pingman59 pingman59 is offline
Mark Arentsen
member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Woodridge, IL
Posts: 67
Default Perhaps more 1 cent packs, thus abundance of wax stains

Quote:
Originally Posted by Volod View Post
Have to wonder why back stains on the '52 Bowman cards are sometimes attributed to "wax staining" and other times to "gum staining." When ripping open the packs back then, I found five cards all facing up, so that only the last card was touching the gum slab. My memory is fuzzy as to whether there was ever a waxed separator between the cards and gum in the pack. But, in any case, since only one card out of five in a pack was in contact with the stuff, why is it so tough to find unstained cards? Maybe there was some other staining process going on at the printshop, apart from gum or wax.
Perhaps more 1 cent packs back then, thus abundance of wax stains? A nickle in 1952 had to be harder to come by for a kid, compared to say 1969, the last year of nickle packs.
Reply With Quote